2019
DOI: 10.1364/ao.58.003501
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative study of calibration-free laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy methods for quantitative elemental analysis of quartz-bearing limestone

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this scenario, the CF-LIBS method appears to be a suitable and effective alternative to the calibration method. In some previous studies, the CF-LIBS method was utilized for measurement of elemental composition of geological samples such as limestone, granite, malachite, and nephrite, and results were compared with standard techniques such as energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX), X-ray fluorescence (XRF), and laser ablation-time of flight-mass spectrometer (LA-TOF-MS) [24][25][26]44,45]. In all of these studies, quantitative results obtained with CF-LIBS showed reasonable agreement with the standard analytical techniques.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In this scenario, the CF-LIBS method appears to be a suitable and effective alternative to the calibration method. In some previous studies, the CF-LIBS method was utilized for measurement of elemental composition of geological samples such as limestone, granite, malachite, and nephrite, and results were compared with standard techniques such as energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX), X-ray fluorescence (XRF), and laser ablation-time of flight-mass spectrometer (LA-TOF-MS) [24][25][26]44,45]. In all of these studies, quantitative results obtained with CF-LIBS showed reasonable agreement with the standard analytical techniques.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, sulfur (S) was not identified in the spectrum, which was not surprising because of the spectral limitation of the detection system. Most of the intense lines of S lie in vacuum ultraviolet (VUV) region, 10-200 nm and these lines fall outside the spectral range of spectrometer used in this study [24]. Iron is known for its busy spectrum, having…”
Section: Qualitative Analysismentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Quantitative LIBS analysis can be performed using calibration curves derived from analysis of certified reference materials. However, the disadvantage of this technique is that reference samples should be matrix-matched, and references materials with a composition similar to unknown samples are not always available e.g., complex rocks having several mineralogical phases in a variety of concentrations [33]. Multivariate algorithms that make use of the information contained in the entire spectrum can also be applied to derive accurate geochemical compositions from geological materials [34,35].…”
Section: Broader Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The calibration method requires calibration curves for all the compositional elements of a sample and comparison with the optical emission spectrum of the corresponding element [ 20 , 21 ]. The use of this method in quantitative analysis of multi-elemental geological samples is limited by the lengthy and tedious procedure and the error caused by the matrix effect [ 22 , 23 ], whereas the calibration-free method involves the measurement of elemental concentration of elements in a sample by theoretical calculations using values of the plasma parameters [ 24 , 25 ]. This methodology is preferred over the calibration method because it eliminates the matrix effect and requires no reference sample.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%