2019 6th International Conference on Behavioral, Economic and Socio-Cultural Computing (BESC) 2019
DOI: 10.1109/besc48373.2019.8963009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative study of Bitcoin price prediction using WaveNets, Recurrent Neural Networks and other Machine Learning Methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Different methods were applied in the construction of the Bitcoin price prediction model to build a reliable model, which is contrasted with various methodologies used in previous works to check with which technique a high predictive capacity is achieved; specifically, the methods of deep recurrent neural networks, deep neural decision trees, and deep support vector machines, were used. Furthermore, this work attempts to obtain high accuracy, but it is also robust and stable in the future horizon to predict new observations, something that has not yet been reported by previous works [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15], but which some authors demand for the development of these models and their real contribution [9,12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Different methods were applied in the construction of the Bitcoin price prediction model to build a reliable model, which is contrasted with various methodologies used in previous works to check with which technique a high predictive capacity is achieved; specifically, the methods of deep recurrent neural networks, deep neural decision trees, and deep support vector machines, were used. Furthermore, this work attempts to obtain high accuracy, but it is also robust and stable in the future horizon to predict new observations, something that has not yet been reported by previous works [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15], but which some authors demand for the development of these models and their real contribution [9,12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Linardatos and Kotsiantis [12] had the same results, after using eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) and LSTM; they concluded that this last technique yielded a lower RMSE of 0.999. Despite the superiority of computational techniques, Felizardo and colleagues [13] showed that ARIMA had a lower error rate than methods, such as random forest (RF), support vector machine (SVM), LSTM, and WaveNets, to predict the future price of Bitcoin. Finally, other works showed new deep learning methods, such as Dutta, Kumar, and Basu [14], who applied both LSTM and the gated recurring unit (GRU) model; the latter showed the best error result, with an RMSE of 0.019.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, RF can work faster and better on large training samples, with the training time significantly faster than the SVM. However, some studies have shown that RF performed worse than the regression models in modeling linear data [55,113]. In short, it is suitable for nonlinear, stationary, and highly volatile data.…”
Section: Support Vector Machine (Svm)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The price time series data is processed into tensors and fed into a LSTM model, which achieved a better F1-score for this binary classification task, compared to a baseline gradient boosting model. LSTMs are a popular architecture for time-series prediction, and other researchers have also used them to predict cryptocurrency prices using technical indicators (Aditya Pai, Devareddy, Hegde and Ramya, 2022), (Wu, Lu, Ma and Lu, 2018) (Shin, Mohaisen and Kim, 2021), (Felizardo, Oliveira, Del-Moral-Hernandez and Cozman, 2019). Using a different neural network architecture, Alonso-Monsalve, Suárez-Cetrulo, Cervantes and Quintana (2020) adopted Convolutional Neutral Networks (CNNs) and compared their prediction results to a simple Multilayer Perceptron (MLP), as well as an LSTM model.…”
Section: Btc Price Prediction With Technical Indicatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…WaveNet is a network based upon the concept of Temporal CNNs with residual connections. Felizardo et al (2019) did a comparison study between WaveNet, ARIMA, Random Forest, SVM, and LSTM to predict the future price of Bitcoin using OHLCV data. They found that the ARIMA model and the SVM equally outperformed the other models including WaveNet.…”
Section: Btc Price Prediction With Technical Indicatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%