2017
DOI: 10.1063/1.5010513
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative study of As (III) and Zn (II) removal from aqueous solutions using Philippine natural zeolite and alumina

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The pH of the solution was adjusted to 2.5 with NaOH solution or 2% H 2 SO4 solution. [15][16][17] When the solution was adjusted, the mixture was agitated using a bottle roller equipment at 100 rpm for 3 and 6 h. The residual arsenic concentration was determined, and the removal efficiency was calculated using Eq. ( 1):…”
Section: Adsorption Studies On Arsenicmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The pH of the solution was adjusted to 2.5 with NaOH solution or 2% H 2 SO4 solution. [15][16][17] When the solution was adjusted, the mixture was agitated using a bottle roller equipment at 100 rpm for 3 and 6 h. The residual arsenic concentration was determined, and the removal efficiency was calculated using Eq. ( 1):…”
Section: Adsorption Studies On Arsenicmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pH of the solution was adjusted to 2.5 with NaOH solution or 2% H 2 SO4 solution. [15][16][17] Once the solution was pH adjusted, the mixture was agitated using a bottle roller equipment at 100 rpm for 0.5 h, 1 h, 3 h, 6 h, 12 h, 16 h and 24 h. The solution was filtered using filter paper and the eluate was analyzed using the AAS.…”
Section: Adsorption Studies On Arsenicmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations