2014
DOI: 10.1007/s11269-014-0802-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative Study of Artificial Neural Networks and Wavelet Artificial Neural Networks for Groundwater Depth Data Forecasting with Various Curve Fractal Dimensions

Abstract: The objective of this study was comparative study of artificial neural networks (ANN) and wavelet artificial neural networks (WANN) for time-series groundwater depth data (GWD) forecasting with various curve fractal dimensions. The paper offered a better method of revealing the change characteristics of GWD. Time series prediction based on ANN algorithms is fundamentally difficult to capture the data change details, when the time-series GWD data changes are more complex. For this purpose, Wavelet analysis and … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence, it is recommended to use sufficient and continuous groundwater level data for constructing the NARX model. The data period considered in the current study for the monthly groundwater level data (Table 1) are comparable with previous artificial intelligence modeling studies, which used comparable time spans for monthly groundwater data modeling (e.g., 9 years period [37], 10 years period [38], 11 years period [39], and 9 years period [40]). Figure 6 shows the observed and modeled groundwater levels at the BN-1A well at all validation rounds.…”
Section: Modeling Resultssupporting
confidence: 64%
“…Hence, it is recommended to use sufficient and continuous groundwater level data for constructing the NARX model. The data period considered in the current study for the monthly groundwater level data (Table 1) are comparable with previous artificial intelligence modeling studies, which used comparable time spans for monthly groundwater data modeling (e.g., 9 years period [37], 10 years period [38], 11 years period [39], and 9 years period [40]). Figure 6 shows the observed and modeled groundwater levels at the BN-1A well at all validation rounds.…”
Section: Modeling Resultssupporting
confidence: 64%
“…Artificial intelligence (AI) has been proven of their feasibility in capturing nonlinear relationships. Artificial intelligence has been widely used in many fields (Cassimon et al 2020;Guo et al 2020;He et al 2014), and AI can quickly diagnose COVID-19 (Zhang et al 2020). To overcome limitations of the epidemiological model, we develop artificial intelligence (AI) for real-time predicting of the new confirmed cases of COVID-19 all over the world.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Four performance criteria are employed to assess the validity of WANNs and ANNs adopted in the research. These are root mean square error (RMSE), mean error (ME), percentage error of peak (EO p ), and correlation coefficient (R), which are as follows (He et al, 2014):…”
Section: Evaluation Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Artificial neural network (ANN) has been performed to predict ground motion (Wiszniowski, 2016), and groundwater depth (He et al, 2014). In particular, ANN has been shown to be effective for more complex tasks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%