2005
DOI: 10.1159/000090233
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative Study of Antibiotic-Containing Polymethylmetacrylate Capsules and Beads

Abstract: Background: This study aimed at making local antibiotic therapy wider in cases of chronic suppurations by administering antibiotics which previously could not be given in this way through the conventional polymethylmetacrylate (PMMA) carrier techniques. Capsules from this material were produced with a pressing machine designed and laid out by us. The characteristics of antibiotic penetration from this novel carrier were compared to those of PMMA beads. Methods: The time-dependent outflow of amikacin, clindamyc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We consider that, after radical debridement, inserting the combination of 70 w/w%:0.5 mm and 60 w/w%:0.6 mm capsules directly into the site of the infection could provide ideal and relatively even local drug concentration, giving the best possibility of killing or inhibiting the growth of bacteria. Furthermore, the removal of the capsules would not be obligatory (Börzsei et al, 2006a), since PMMA is not immunogenic (Nandi et al, 2009); however, we would nevertheless recommend the removal of the capsules 6–8 weeks after their implantation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We consider that, after radical debridement, inserting the combination of 70 w/w%:0.5 mm and 60 w/w%:0.6 mm capsules directly into the site of the infection could provide ideal and relatively even local drug concentration, giving the best possibility of killing or inhibiting the growth of bacteria. Furthermore, the removal of the capsules would not be obligatory (Börzsei et al, 2006a), since PMMA is not immunogenic (Nandi et al, 2009); however, we would nevertheless recommend the removal of the capsules 6–8 weeks after their implantation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An ideal LADV should provide efficient therapeutic drug release at the target site over several weeks (Wu et al, 2006) and be capable of using wide range of drugs. Therefore, we have developed, manufactured and tested a PMMA—sorbitol‐based capsule system [as an improvement of that of Börzsei et al (2006a, 2006b)] as a LADV for the treatment of chronic osteomyelitis (Frank et al, 2011). BPB (Bromophenol Blue) was used as a release marker to determine the most effective combinations of wall thickness and sorbitol content.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PMMA is known as a drug delivery system for antibiotics [14] . The material has furthermore been the standard bone cement for the fixation of artificial hip joints for decades and was used in combination with various drug loadings [14,15] . It is therefore expected not to interfere with drug effects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After adding the liquid monomer to the powder mix, cylindrical blocks were made. The technique used by Börzsei et al (2006a, 2006b) was further improved by using a milling machine instead of a press to prepare the capsules. Therefore, capsules were milled out from these blocks with wall thickness of 0.3, 0.4, 0.5 and 0.6 mm.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%