2000
DOI: 10.1143/jjap.39.1252
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative Study of Anchoring Strengths for Photo- and Rubbing-Aligned Liquid Crystals on Photoisomerizable Polyimide Alignment Films

Abstract: The high-electric-field technique was used to measure the out-of-plane (polar) anchoring strength at the interface between a nematic liquid crystal, pentylcyanobiphenyl (5CB), and a photosensitive polyimide (PI) alignment layer possessing an azo group in the main chain. The anchoring energy of the photoaligned state was found to be rather strong, on the order of 0.1 mJ/m2, being at least half of the anchoring energy on the rubbed surface of the same azo PI. The anchoring energy exhibite… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In that case, the threshold field is expressed as K 22 / ε. The switching field strength of 6.8 V rms µm −1 in this experiment was reasonable considering the previous anchoring strength results of previous studies for the alignment material used in this experiment [26]. With varying field directions, the brightness changed with the switching of the bulk directors and the states that were stable without the field.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…In that case, the threshold field is expressed as K 22 / ε. The switching field strength of 6.8 V rms µm −1 in this experiment was reasonable considering the previous anchoring strength results of previous studies for the alignment material used in this experiment [26]. With varying field directions, the brightness changed with the switching of the bulk directors and the states that were stable without the field.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…However, we quote the values obtained for another LC, viz., 5CB. Again, the values vary between 0.9 × 10 −4 to 3 × 10 −4 J m −2 , [ 65–67 ] and thus not very different from that for EPD h‐BN. In contrast, cell with EPD h‐BN has ≈30% higher value than that reported for the cell with a CVD‐grown h‐BN layer ( W θ = 2.4 × 10 −4 J m −2 for EPD h‐BN and 1.8 × 10 −4 J m −2 for CVD h‐BN [ 58 ] ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Photoalignment is primarily categorized into three types in terms of the photoreactions that induce anisotropy. First is photoanisotropy caused by azobenzene 14,21,24,25,31,32,48–61 . Second is photodimerization caused by cinnamate, coumarin, and chalcone 15–17,27,62–81 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First is photoanisotropy caused by azobenzene. 14,21,24,25,31,32,[48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56][57][58][59][60][61] Second is photodimerization caused by cinnamate, coumarin, and chalcone. [15][16][17]27,[62][63][64][65][66][67][68][69][70][71][72][73][74][75][76][77][78][79][80][81] Third is polyimide undergoing photodecomposition.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%