1969
DOI: 10.1016/s0021-9673(01)80642-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative study of a direct and a new indirect gas-liquid chromatographic procedure for the estimation of water in natural products

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1969
1969
1994
1994

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 11 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some of their recommendations have been used in the routine analysis of trace organics in water (4). There are also many suggestions for the GC analysis of trace water in an organic solvent (5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22). However, none of these has been widely accepted in practice, presumably for the following reasons: (1) the Karl Fischer titration method has become a de facto standard method for water content determination, and highly specialized and automated commercial units are readily available, (2) the reliability and accuracy of GC methods have not been well demonstrated for routine applications, (3) some GC methods are complicated and require both specialized personnel and analytical equipment which may not be readily available, and (4) some GC methods are tedious and inefficient and do not have general applicability.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of their recommendations have been used in the routine analysis of trace organics in water (4). There are also many suggestions for the GC analysis of trace water in an organic solvent (5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22). However, none of these has been widely accepted in practice, presumably for the following reasons: (1) the Karl Fischer titration method has become a de facto standard method for water content determination, and highly specialized and automated commercial units are readily available, (2) the reliability and accuracy of GC methods have not been well demonstrated for routine applications, (3) some GC methods are complicated and require both specialized personnel and analytical equipment which may not be readily available, and (4) some GC methods are tedious and inefficient and do not have general applicability.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%