2022
DOI: 10.1186/s43163-022-00268-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative study between single-stage multilevel surgery and staged surgery for management of snoring and/or obstructive sleep apnea

Abstract: Background When the nasal obstruction is identified in cases of snoring and/or OSA with suspected oropharyngeal and nasal obstruction, the combination of nasal and palate surgeries is suggested to be conducted in either a single-staged or multi-staged manner. This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of combined nasal-palatopharyngeal surgery in a staged versus a single-stage multilevel procedure. Methods Prospective randomized comparative… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 34 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The stacking of concomitant procedures for customized patient therapy was not associated with a significantly increased risk. This finding is in line with recent studies that have highlighted the safety profile of multilevel OSA surgery [27][28][29][30][31]. More specifically, the SAMS randomized clinical trial involved 51 patients undergoing multilevel OSA surgery (i.e., uvulopalatopharyngoplasty and minimally invasive tongue volume reduction), with only two participants (4%) experiencing postoperative adverse events [30].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…The stacking of concomitant procedures for customized patient therapy was not associated with a significantly increased risk. This finding is in line with recent studies that have highlighted the safety profile of multilevel OSA surgery [27][28][29][30][31]. More specifically, the SAMS randomized clinical trial involved 51 patients undergoing multilevel OSA surgery (i.e., uvulopalatopharyngoplasty and minimally invasive tongue volume reduction), with only two participants (4%) experiencing postoperative adverse events [30].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%