2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.medcli.2017.11.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative study between obstetric antiphospholipid syndrome and obstetric morbidity related with antiphospholipid antibodies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…8 In the EUROAPS cohort, 75.82% of the non-criteria APS patients received therapies and when treated both APS and non-criteria APS patients had similar good fetal-maternal outcomes. 18 Generally speaking, the treatment assigned to NCAPS patients was globally less intensive than APS patients. In our study, we could also tell that LMWH was used more in APS group than in NCAPS group.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8 In the EUROAPS cohort, 75.82% of the non-criteria APS patients received therapies and when treated both APS and non-criteria APS patients had similar good fetal-maternal outcomes. 18 Generally speaking, the treatment assigned to NCAPS patients was globally less intensive than APS patients. In our study, we could also tell that LMWH was used more in APS group than in NCAPS group.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sample was small. A second retrospective cohort study compared women with non-criteria obstetric APS, who were treated with LDA and heparin, with untreated women; live births occurred in 81.7% and 55% of pregnancies, respectively 80. Because these studies did not focus specifically on the population of interest, evidence for this question is indirect.…”
Section: Obstetric Apsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…History of delivery ≥ 34 weeks due to eclampsia or severe pre-eclampsia, or placental insufficiency. One study compared 71 women with various non-criteria obstetric APS complications (two consecutive miscarriages <10 weeks, delivery ≥34 weeks, late intrauterine growth restriction, abruption placentae at term or placental haematoma), who were treated with LDA and heparin, with 20 untreated women; live births occurred in 81.7% and 55%, respectively 80. An unknown percentage of women in this study matched the population of interest.…”
Section: Obstetric Apsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Growing evidences claim to consider the clinical impact of low level positive aPL antibodies and the necessity to set new cut-off levels, basically—though not exclusively—in obstetric APS (Devreese et al, 2010; Mekinian et al, 2012). The proposal to modify the APS classification criteria, mostly referring to laboratory requirements, is reinforced also by consideration that no differences were observed on obstetric complications, gestational period, arterial and/or venous thrombosis, when comparing pregnant women with aPL-related obstetric complications not fulfilling the Sydney criteria, with those fulfilling them (Arachchillage et al, 2015; Alijotas-Reig et al, 2018). Considering that also atypical (low or non-persistent), aPL antibodies presence may be associated with neurological disorders, such as transient ischemic attacks and migraine, but also epilepsy, transverse myelitis, multiple sclerosis (MS)-like syndrome, visual symptoms, dementia and chorea as well (Islam et al, 2016).…”
Section: Current Challenges In the Diagnosis And Management Of The Anmentioning
confidence: 99%