Procceedings of the 24th ABCM International Congress of Mechanicl Engineering 2017
DOI: 10.26678/abcm.cobem2017.cob17-2202
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative Study Between Gmaw-Cw and Gmaw-Ew Processes With Addition of a Cold Energised Wire

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The deposition rate was increased by 77% to 17.2 kg h -1 in direct comparison with conventional GMAW, while the heat input increased by only 15%. Rodrigues dos Reis et al (2017) [19] compared the process with GMAW cold wire and attested the hot wire process a better output, lower spatter tendency, better weldability and a better seam appearance. An investigation of the directional dependency showed that the process is less subject to strong uctuations in the seam result depending on the wire feed direction.…”
Section: Single-wire Gmawmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The deposition rate was increased by 77% to 17.2 kg h -1 in direct comparison with conventional GMAW, while the heat input increased by only 15%. Rodrigues dos Reis et al (2017) [19] compared the process with GMAW cold wire and attested the hot wire process a better output, lower spatter tendency, better weldability and a better seam appearance. An investigation of the directional dependency showed that the process is less subject to strong uctuations in the seam result depending on the wire feed direction.…”
Section: Single-wire Gmawmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this way, a reduction of the heat input into the component can be realised with an increase in productivity compared to conventional GMAW. Rodrigues dos Reis et al (2017) [19] state that the deposition rate can be at least doubled compared to conventional GMAW welding. Investigating the effect of different wire feeding directions, they found that a piercing cold wire feed partially damaged the weld, while a dragging cold wire feed was prone to spattering.…”
Section: Single-wire Gmawmentioning
confidence: 99%