2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jinorgbio.2017.11.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative studies on DNA-binding and in vitro antitumor activity of enantiomeric ruthenium(II) complexes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A classical intercalation probe (EB) between the two strands of DNA results in significant increase in viscosity of the DNA solution due to an increase in separation of base pairs at the intercalation sites and hence, an increase in overall DNA length. In contrast, partial, nonclassical intercalation of ligand could crook the DNA helix, resulting in shortening of DNA length and, concomitantly, reducing its viscosity [ 32 ]. The thickness of CT-DNA increases with increase in the ratio of complexes to CT-DNA is associated with the specific intercalation binding mode [ 28 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A classical intercalation probe (EB) between the two strands of DNA results in significant increase in viscosity of the DNA solution due to an increase in separation of base pairs at the intercalation sites and hence, an increase in overall DNA length. In contrast, partial, nonclassical intercalation of ligand could crook the DNA helix, resulting in shortening of DNA length and, concomitantly, reducing its viscosity [ 32 ]. The thickness of CT-DNA increases with increase in the ratio of complexes to CT-DNA is associated with the specific intercalation binding mode [ 28 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Docking results showed that compound 1b interacts with DNA helix at regions of DA17; DG10 and DG16; with binding energy of −7.75 kcal/mol and 1c interacts with DNA at the region of DC 21 with binding energy −8.45 kcal/mol. Docked compounds were analyzed in terms of energy, hydrogen bonding, non‐covalent and hydrophobic interaction between compounds and DNA (Figure ) ,. The docked results clearly explained that there is strong interaction between the compounds and 1BNA DNA through intercalative mode of binding.…”
Section: Chemistrymentioning
confidence: 98%
“…As standard parameters for Ru(II) cannot be recognized in Autodock4.2 and zinc possess the same valence (II) and similar atomic radius with ruthenium, Zn (II) parameters were used intead. [30] 2.4 DNA photocleavage experiments The photoinduced DNA cleavage by ruthenium complex was examined by gel electrophoresis. Supercoiled pBR 322 DNA (0.2 μg) was treated with the ruthenium complex in buffer C, and the solution was then irradiated at room temperature with UV light (360 nm) after incubation in the dark for 1 h. The samples were analyzed by electrophoresis for 1 h at 80 V on a 0.8% agarose gel in buffer D. The gel was stained with 1 μg•mL −1 EB and photographed under UV light.…”
Section: Molecular Dockingmentioning
confidence: 99%