1975
DOI: 10.1515/hfsg.1975.29.5.153
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative Studies on Cellulolytic Enzyme Lignin and Milled Wood Lignin of Sweetgum and Spruce

Abstract: Keywords Milled wood lignin Cellulolytic enzyme lignin Enzyme lignin Liquidambar styraciflua Picea abies Sweetgum Spruce Schlüsselwörter (Sachgebiete) B j örkman-Lignin Cellulolytisch.es Enzym-Lignin Enzym-Lignin Liquidambar styraciflua Picea abies Amberbaum Fichte Comparative Studies on Cellulolytic Enzyme Lignin and Milled Wood Lignin of Sweetgum and Spruce SummaryMilled wood lignin (MWL) and Cellulolytic enzyme lignin (CEL) were isolated from the same batch of ball milled sapwood of sweetgum and Norway spru… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

15
286
0
4

Year Published

1999
1999
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 328 publications
(305 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
15
286
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The dried materials were ball-milled using a stainless steel vibratory ball mill for 1.5 h (with 0.5 h on, 0.5 h off, to minimize heating). The ballmilled materials (50 g) were submitted to enzymatic digestion with crude cellulases (Cellulysin, Calbiochem) for polysaccharide degradation [25,54,55]. As with aspen and poplar, the enzymatic treatment was particularly efficient at removing polysaccharides, leaving just 22.2 and 20.9 % of the cell wall from the EFB and frond samples, respectively.…”
Section: Sample Preparation and Lignin Isolationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dried materials were ball-milled using a stainless steel vibratory ball mill for 1.5 h (with 0.5 h on, 0.5 h off, to minimize heating). The ballmilled materials (50 g) were submitted to enzymatic digestion with crude cellulases (Cellulysin, Calbiochem) for polysaccharide degradation [25,54,55]. As with aspen and poplar, the enzymatic treatment was particularly efficient at removing polysaccharides, leaving just 22.2 and 20.9 % of the cell wall from the EFB and frond samples, respectively.…”
Section: Sample Preparation and Lignin Isolationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other approaches are: 1) subjecting the milled wood to enzymatic treatment with cellulolytic enzymes to remove most of the carbohydrate components (Chang et al 1975;Wu and Argyropoulos 2003;Holtman et al 2004;Hu et al 2006); 2) completely dissolving ball-milled wood in a solvent system (dimethylsulfoxide, DMSO, and N-methylimidazol, NMI) followed by precipitation in dioxane/water in the course of which lignin and carbohydrate fractions are separated (Fasching et al 2008); or 3) isolating most of the lignin as lignin-carbohydrate complexes after endoglucanase treatment (Henriksson et al 2007). However, it is well recognized that these lignin preparations, in particular the MWL due to its low yield, represent only a part of the native lignin in the wood cell wall and may not be representative of the whole lignin present.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, the most widely used lignin preparations for structure studies are milled-wood lignin (MWL) (Björkman 1954) and cellulolytic enzyme lignin (CEL), with the CEL being structurally similar to the MWL (Chang et al 1975). Fasching et al (2008) developed a novel method for lignin isolation based on a liquid-liquid extraction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%