1990
DOI: 10.1007/bf01202124
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative studies of the development of endosperm-degrading enzymes in malting sorghum and barley

Abstract: The endosperm cell walls of barley are degraded extensively during malting whilst those of sorghum are not. Malting barley produced endo-β-1,3:1,4-glucanase, endo-β-1,3-glucanase and pentosanase in large quantities. In contrast, malting sorghum developed mainly endo-β-1,3-glucanase and pentosanase. Although the limited break-down of the endosperm cell walls of sorghum may reflect sub-optimal activities of β-glucanases, such as endo-β-1,3:1,4-glucanases, it is possible that the highly intractable nature of the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
39
1

Year Published

1992
1992
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
3
39
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In terms of malting conditions in the three localities, the ␣-amylase potential of the malts was better under laboratory conditions at ICBD than under local conditions at Mindjil and Yagoua (Tables V, VI). The low ␤-amylase potential of sorghum has been confirmed by these studies 7,8,18 . Poor degradation of ␤-glucans during malting and poor hydrolysis of starch during mashing can lead to slow wort filtration, reduced extraction efficiency, and haze formation in beers 18 .…”
Section: )79087 %2( (-7'977-32supporting
confidence: 55%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In terms of malting conditions in the three localities, the ␣-amylase potential of the malts was better under laboratory conditions at ICBD than under local conditions at Mindjil and Yagoua (Tables V, VI). The low ␤-amylase potential of sorghum has been confirmed by these studies 7,8,18 . Poor degradation of ␤-glucans during malting and poor hydrolysis of starch during mashing can lead to slow wort filtration, reduced extraction efficiency, and haze formation in beers 18 .…”
Section: )79087 %2( (-7'977-32supporting
confidence: 55%
“…Mashing was carried out by the decantation process where separated, enzyme-active worts were used to convert the gelatinized starch of the mash 2,3,8,18 . Duplicates of about 52 g of sorghum malt were ground (disc setting at 0.7 mm) using a Buhler Universal Laboratory Disc Mill (type DLFU) and 50 g weighed into a mashing beaker which was placed into a mashing bath attemperated to 45°C.…”
Section: Ewlmrk Sj Wsvklyq Qepxwmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other authors have also reported similar differences 9,11,13,17 . Etokakpan and Palmer 13,14 observed that BM (75°L) had 5 times more diastatic power and its endosperm cell walls were degraded more extensively during malting than SM (15°L). Taylor 27 and Daiber and Taylor 11 concluded that BM has a 6°C lower gelatinization temperature, about 3 and 4 times more diastatic and ␤-amylase activities than SM.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Demuyakor et al 14 found that ␤-glucan levels in sorghum malt extract were very low compared with barley malt extract. Etokakpan and Palmer 15 observed that filtration of sorghum beer was not related to the ␤-glucan content but rather to its composition. For 0%, 20% and 40% sorghum mashes the viscosity of the resultant wort significantly decreased as the amount of sorghum was increased (Table III) (p < 0.01).…”
Section: Ewlmrk [Mxl Kvmwxw Gsqtvmwih Sj Yrqepxih Wsvklyq -Erh Qepximentioning
confidence: 99%