1984
DOI: 10.1292/jvms1939.46.519
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative studies of physicochemical and biological properties between canine parvovirus and feline panleukopenia virus.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
1

Year Published

1986
1986
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
12
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It has been reported that CPV showed a wider HA spectrum and higher HA titre than FPLV (Appel et al, 1979;Carmichael et al, 1980;Lenghaus & Studdert, 1980;Goto et al, 1984). This discrepancy may be attributed to the HA methods used in the tests.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…It has been reported that CPV showed a wider HA spectrum and higher HA titre than FPLV (Appel et al, 1979;Carmichael et al, 1980;Lenghaus & Studdert, 1980;Goto et al, 1984). This discrepancy may be attributed to the HA methods used in the tests.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Amino acid residues different from MEV-Abashiri except for these nine are indicated by arrowheads. DNA sequences of CPV-Kushiro (Goto et al, 1984), CPV-CP49 (Azetaka et aL, 1980) and CPV-obl were determined by direct sequencing of PCR products; those of MEV-A and -D, FPLV-Carl and FPLV-193 were reported by Parrish et al (1988a), Carlson et aL (1985) and Martyn et al (1990), respectively.…”
Section: Involvement Of Ns Genementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Strain Abashiri of MEV (Higashihara et al, 1981) was propagated in FLF-3 cells, a feline lung fibroblast cell line, as described previously (Goto et al, 1984). MEV RF-DNAs, either free from (f-DNA) or with (p-DNA) the terminal proteins, were prepared from MEV-infected cells as described elsewhere (Shinagawa et al, 1989).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although MEV, FPLV and CPV are closely related viruses, they are distinguishable from each other antigenically when examined with monoclonal antibodies (Parrish et al, 1982;Parrish & Carmichael, 1983;Surleraux et al, 1987), by thermoresistance and haemagglutination reactions (Carmichael et al, 1980;Goto et al, 1984), and by their growth characteristics in cultured ceils (Tratschin et al, 1982). It would contribute greatly to the understanding of the evolution of these viruses if the differences in these characteristics were shown to correspond to differences in nucleotide sequences.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%