1984
DOI: 10.2514/3.8572
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative studies of atmospheric density models used for earth satellite orbit estimation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Especially for LEO satellites, atmosphere drag would cause considerable orbit decay and it is the main error source in orbital prediction. Most empirical atmospheric density models [25], such as Jacchia [26], NRLMSISE [27], DTM [28], Jacchia-Bowman 2006 [30] and Russian GOST [31] combine theoretical computation with drag measurements of satellites. Their accuracy is much better than the traditional exponential one, but still no better than 10%~30%.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Especially for LEO satellites, atmosphere drag would cause considerable orbit decay and it is the main error source in orbital prediction. Most empirical atmospheric density models [25], such as Jacchia [26], NRLMSISE [27], DTM [28], Jacchia-Bowman 2006 [30] and Russian GOST [31] combine theoretical computation with drag measurements of satellites. Their accuracy is much better than the traditional exponential one, but still no better than 10%~30%.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It cannot be used in high-accuracy studies. In order to improve the accuracy, the empirical density models [1], such as Jacchia [2], NRLMSISE [3], DTM [4], and Russian GOST [5] are found by combining theoretical computation with measurements of satellite drag [6]. Their accuracies are much better than that of the exponential model, but still no better than 10%-30% [7,8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%