1952
DOI: 10.1080/00049158.1952.10675296
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative Strengths of the Timber of Californian-Grown and South Australian-Grown Monterey Pine (Pinus Radiata Don.)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1959
1959
2004
2004

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…of Forest Products, 1939;Kelsey and Steele, 1956) indicate that, in this property also, Australian wood performs essentially the same as the native California material. A study of density and some flexure properties of wood from four trees from the natural Monterey pine forest of California was reported by Moulds (1952). Table 9 shows a comparison of the species means for those four trees and the four from the same forest area used in this study.…”
Section: Cockrell: Mechanical Properties Of California Monterey Pine 23imentioning
confidence: 99%
“…of Forest Products, 1939;Kelsey and Steele, 1956) indicate that, in this property also, Australian wood performs essentially the same as the native California material. A study of density and some flexure properties of wood from four trees from the natural Monterey pine forest of California was reported by Moulds (1952). Table 9 shows a comparison of the species means for those four trees and the four from the same forest area used in this study.…”
Section: Cockrell: Mechanical Properties Of California Monterey Pine 23imentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This aspect is of interest to industries making products such as pulp, paper and fibreboard, as well as for the production of wood in a forest. Density is considered one of the most important indices of timber strength properties as it has been positively correlated with such properties as modulus of rupture (MOR) and modulus of elasticity (MOE) (Bendtsen, 1978), maximum crushing strength (Moulds, 1952), hardness and shrinkage (Brunden, 1964), and it also has a considerable influence on machinability, conversion, acoustic properties, and wearability (Fielding, 1967). These density variations have also been indicated for effects on permeability (McQuire, 1975).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%