2013
DOI: 10.1080/1536383x.2011.588812
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative Spectroscopic Characterization of the Basic and the Higher Fullerenes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

30
58
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(90 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
30
58
2
Order By: Relevance
“…450 to 1650 cm −1 . The general pattern of the obtained spectra and all the observed absorption bands of the chromatographically isolated samples of the stable C 76 and C 84 isomers with D 2 symmetry from the several different original, advanced separation processes [22][23][24][25][26][27][28] are in excellent agreement with the semiempirical, ab initio, and density functional theory (DFT) theoretical calculations for these molecules [5-12, 29, 30] over the mentioned relevant region. It should be noted that some low frequencies can exist below the observational limit of 400 cm −1 .…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…450 to 1650 cm −1 . The general pattern of the obtained spectra and all the observed absorption bands of the chromatographically isolated samples of the stable C 76 and C 84 isomers with D 2 symmetry from the several different original, advanced separation processes [22][23][24][25][26][27][28] are in excellent agreement with the semiempirical, ab initio, and density functional theory (DFT) theoretical calculations for these molecules [5-12, 29, 30] over the mentioned relevant region. It should be noted that some low frequencies can exist below the observational limit of 400 cm −1 .…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…Eklund and co-workers in a pioneering study on the photoinduced dimerization of C 60 fullerene thin fi lms. [ 31 , 32 ] The generic reaction scheme preceding fullerene dimerization is presented in Figure 2 a, where k 1 -k 6 represents the rate constants of the possible reaction paths between the ground-state monomer, M, the singlet-excited monomer, 1 M * , the triplet-excited monomer, 3 M * , and the dimer, D. Note that monomers in the higher excited singlet states are omitted from the diagram, as they decay very rapidly down to the fi rst excited singlet state; [33][34][35] this rationalizes why the symbol 1 M * is used collectively for the end state of the fi rst excitation step. The division into a k 5 and k' 5 path describes two alternative reaction paths to the D state, and will be discussed in detail later.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within the limits of accuracy of the experimental data presented in Figure 1 c, we fi nd that the fi lm can be fully dimerized, and also Eklund et al interpreted their experimental Raman spectroscopy data as though the overall M → D reaction-rate constant was limited by, and proportional to, the incident light intensity, and therefore suggested that only a single photon is required to be absorbed in order for a dimer to form. [ 32 , 36 ] Notably, all backreaction paths, i.e., k 2 , k 4 and k 6 , must in such a scenario be effectively zero. As a unity absorbed-photon-to-dimer yield is in obvious contradiction to our fi nding of an intensity-dependent dimerization effi ciency (see Figure 1 c and accompanying discussion), we set out to analyze our data in more detail; specifi cally, we are interested in calculating our attained absorbedphoton-to-dimer effi ciency.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations