2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2005.10.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative sorption kinetic studies of ammonium onto zeolite

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
57
3
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 129 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
5
57
3
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In general, assuming that the adsorption rate depends only on the surface area, the surface area of smaller particle will increase, and then dispersion path is shorten in the small adsorbent particle, because it provide a better opportunity to make the absorbed ions penetrate all internal pore structure [33,49,50] . The effect of particle size on the adsorption capacity of ammonia nitrogen has been also confirmed by the use of zeolite previously [51,52] .…”
Section: Particle Size Of Biocharmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…In general, assuming that the adsorption rate depends only on the surface area, the surface area of smaller particle will increase, and then dispersion path is shorten in the small adsorbent particle, because it provide a better opportunity to make the absorbed ions penetrate all internal pore structure [33,49,50] . The effect of particle size on the adsorption capacity of ammonia nitrogen has been also confirmed by the use of zeolite previously [51,52] .…”
Section: Particle Size Of Biocharmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…This study concluded that it is not appropriate to use R 2 to compare the fitting of kinetic models, but did not propose an alternative. More recent research (Wen et al 2006;Ho 2006) also failed to put forward an improved model selection methodology. This paper applies the BIC, LILC, and AIC model selection criterion along with the F-test and the coefficient of determination (R 2 ) to compare the relative and absolute performance of six candidate models applied to high resolution kinetic data from eight experimental systems varying in pCO 2 and calcite surface area.…”
Section: Model Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it is presumed that, in addition to mortality, electrolyte imbalance resulting from increased branchial permeability (Wendelaar Bonga, 1997), contributed to the results in the control group. Although the group exposed to zeolite also showed a statistically higher mortality rate to that found in the groups exposed to salt, it showed total ammonia levels statistically lower (p <0.05) than the other groups, which resulted from the adsorption of ammonia by zeolite (Singh et al, 2004;Wen et al, 2006). The lower mortality ammonia levels in the zeolite group compared with the control group may reflect the deleterious effect of total ammonia levels reached in the control group.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 70%