2018
DOI: 10.1002/mds.27575
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative sensitivity of the MoCA and Mattis Dementia Rating Scale‐2 in Parkinson's disease

Abstract: Background Clinicians and researchers commonly use global cognitive assessments to screen for impairment. Currently there are no published studies directly comparing the sensitivity and specificity of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment and Mattis Dementia Rating Scale‐2 in PD. The objective of this study was to identify the relative sensitivity and specificity of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment and Mattis Dementia Rating Scale‐2 in PD. Methods The Montreal Cognitive Assessment and Mattis Dementia Rating Scale… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We had successfully established modifications of the MoCA for remote telehealth administration, and we thus took this opportunity to switch from the DRS-2 to the MoCA as the main cognitive summary score in patient evaluations. The MoCA summary score reportedly is a more sensitive marker of cognitive impairment than the DRS-2 (Hendershott et al, 2019).…”
Section: Test Modificationsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…We had successfully established modifications of the MoCA for remote telehealth administration, and we thus took this opportunity to switch from the DRS-2 to the MoCA as the main cognitive summary score in patient evaluations. The MoCA summary score reportedly is a more sensitive marker of cognitive impairment than the DRS-2 (Hendershott et al, 2019).…”
Section: Test Modificationsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…The DRS‐2 was administered during the comprehensive neuropsychological assessment and the English version of the MoCA was administered during a neurology visit within 12 months of the neuropsychological assessment (time difference in years: M = −0.38; SD = 0.28). Variables for the MoCA and DRS‐2 are the total scores and the frequency of scores below PD‐specific suggested cutoffs (MoCA ≤ 26; 21–25 DRS‐2 ≤ 139) 24,26 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We recruited 121 participants from the Stanford Movement Disorders Clinic and the surrounding community as previously described. [18][19][20] PD was diagnosed using the UK Parkinson's Disease Society Brain Bank clinical diagnostic criteria. 21 Healthy controls (HCs) were neurologically normal on exam and within 1.5 standard deviations (SDs) of normative values on comprehensive cognitive testing.…”
Section: Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%