2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcsr.2022.107147
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative response assessment of different steel plate shear walls (SPSWs) under near-field ground motion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…High-rise buildings need more brittle infill panels. Infill panels connected only with HBEs dissipate less energy and carry less load than fully connected infill panels but demonstrate the same lateral deformation resistance [24][25][26]. SPSW infill's ductility and post-buckling strength provide seismic stability.…”
Section: Scopementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…High-rise buildings need more brittle infill panels. Infill panels connected only with HBEs dissipate less energy and carry less load than fully connected infill panels but demonstrate the same lateral deformation resistance [24][25][26]. SPSW infill's ductility and post-buckling strength provide seismic stability.…”
Section: Scopementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Elongation of the ring shrinks the diagonal links during tension, preventing the web from sagging perpendicular to the tension field [30,31]. Low-rise buildings subjected to near-field ground motions showed the best performance from unstiffened SPSW systems, whereas RS-SPSW and honeycomb-SPSW systems demonstrated good resistance to induced structural acceleration and dampening effects [26]. Prior to suggesting a new and improved configuration of MSCSS that addresses common problems faced by structural engineers in high-rise building design, in this research, plastic deformation and plastic and viscous dissipation in various MSCSS configurations under seismic loads are studied.…”
Section: Scopementioning
confidence: 99%