2016
DOI: 10.4238/gmr.15028465
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative quantitative trait locus mapping of maize flowering-related traits in an F2:3 and recombinant inbred line population

Abstract: ABSTRACT. Flowering-related traits in maize are affected by complex factors and are important for the improvement of cropping systems in the maize zone. Quantitative trait loci (QTLs) detected using different materials and methods usually vary. In the present study, 266 maize (Zea mays) F 2:3 families and 301 recombinant inbred lines (RIL) derived from a cross between 08-641 (founding parent from southeast China) and Ye478 (founding parent from China) were evaluated for four flowering-related traits, including… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The flowering time of maize exhibits tremendous natural diversity [18]. To identify the genetic factors that control the variation in maize flowering time, several populations have been constructed for the extensive mapping of quantitative trait loci (QTLs) [19][20][21][22]. A combination of bi-parental association populations and high-throughput sequencing technology was used to reveal that the flowering time of maize is controlled by complex genetic structures, for which numerous smalleffect QTLs have been mapped [18,23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The flowering time of maize exhibits tremendous natural diversity [18]. To identify the genetic factors that control the variation in maize flowering time, several populations have been constructed for the extensive mapping of quantitative trait loci (QTLs) [19][20][21][22]. A combination of bi-parental association populations and high-throughput sequencing technology was used to reveal that the flowering time of maize is controlled by complex genetic structures, for which numerous smalleffect QTLs have been mapped [18,23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A large number of QTLs have been identified for maize flowering time-related traits [5][6][7]. In the study of , six QTLs on chromosomes 1, 5, 9, and 10 were detected for DTT, explaining 3.42-11.79% of the phenotypic variation; twenty-one QTLs on chromosomes 1, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, and 10 were detected for DTP, explaining 0.8-12.95% of the phenotypic variation; twenty-two QTLs on chromosomes 1, 3, 4, 5, 6,7, 9, and 10 were detected for DTS, explaining 1.77-13.47% of the phenotypic variation; and seventeen QTLs on chromosomes 1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 10 were detected for anthesis-silking interval (ASI), explaining 0.38-13% of the phenotypic variation [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A large number of QTLs have been identified for maize flowering time-related traits [5][6][7]. In the study of , six QTLs on chromosomes 1, 5, 9, and 10 were detected for DTT, explaining 3.42-11.79% of the phenotypic variation; twenty-one QTLs on chromosomes 1, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, and 10 were detected for DTP, explaining 0.8-12.95% of the phenotypic variation; twenty-two QTLs on chromosomes 1, 3, 4, 5, 6,7, 9, and 10 were detected for DTS, explaining 1.77-13.47% of the phenotypic variation; and seventeen QTLs on chromosomes 1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 10 were detected for anthesis-silking interval (ASI), explaining 0.38-13% of the phenotypic variation [5]. In the RIL population of B73 × Abe2, eight QTLs with the phenotypic variation explained (PVE) ranging from 1.92 to 17.28%, thirteen QTLs with the PVE ranging from 2.09 to 13.08%, and fifteen QTLs with the PVE ranging from 2.28 to 14.87% were identified for days to heading (DTH), DTS, and days to anthesis (DTA), respectively (Shi et al, 2022) [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%