2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jprot.2012.10.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative proteomic analysis for assessment of the ecological significance of maize and peanut intercropping

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
33
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
3
33
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Research work also revealed that space for higher cereals can be altered to a certain degree without reducing its yield while providing a more promising environment for the intercropped legume (Chui & Richards, 1984). Hongchun et al (2013) reported that intercropping with maize did not disturb fresh weight of peanut associated with monocropping. The use of twin rather than single irregular rows of each species improved intercrop soybean yield without materially varying maize performance comparative to mono cropping (Maluleke et al, 2005).…”
Section: Effect Of Intercropping On Growth and Yield Of Legumesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Research work also revealed that space for higher cereals can be altered to a certain degree without reducing its yield while providing a more promising environment for the intercropped legume (Chui & Richards, 1984). Hongchun et al (2013) reported that intercropping with maize did not disturb fresh weight of peanut associated with monocropping. The use of twin rather than single irregular rows of each species improved intercrop soybean yield without materially varying maize performance comparative to mono cropping (Maluleke et al, 2005).…”
Section: Effect Of Intercropping On Growth and Yield Of Legumesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Peanut/maize intercropping is known to progress Fe nutrition in all peanut tissues (Hongchun et al, 2013). Enhancement in the Fe nutrition of peanut intercropped with maize was mainly caused by rhizosphere collaboration between peanut and maize (Zuo et al, 2000).…”
Section: Effect Of Intercropping On Nutrients Uptakementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ding et al (2009Ding et al ( , 2010 showed that when Fe deficiency symptoms appeared in monocropped peanut, transcript levels of the Fe(III)-chelate reductase gene AhFRO1 and Fe 2þ -regulated transporter gene AhIRT1 were higher in roots of intercropped than monocropped peanut in glasshouse pot experiments. However, Xiong et al (2013b) found taht the expression of Fe-acquisition genes (mRNA) including both AhFRO1 and AhIRT1 was significantly upregulated by monocropping in glasshouse pot experiments. These conflicting findings may be explained by differences in the growth stages and conditions or Fe supplies (Table 2).…”
Section: Molecular and Physiological Processes In The Rhizosphere In mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many trials were conducted in order to investigate influence of different species in intercrops, especially cereals and legumes, such as maize and beans (Fischler et al 1999), maize and peanut (Xiong et al 2013), wheat and chickpea (Banik et al 2006, Betencourt et al 2012, barley and pea (Launay et al 2009). …”
Section: Manuscript Received April 2014mentioning
confidence: 99%