Proceedings. IEEE INFOCOM '90: Ninth Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies@m_The Multiple F
DOI: 10.1109/infcom.1990.91367
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative performance study of space priority mechanisms for ATM networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
28
0
4

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 95 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
28
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Threshold-based Push-out and Probabilistic Push-out schemes [7] have been found to provide more flexibility in tuning the cell loss probability but their implementation seems to be complex while still having the restriction that the class with strict cell loss requirement is the one with the low cell delay requirement. Comparisons between various space-priority schemes are presented in [8][9][10]. It turns out that such schemes are fairly effective in inducing fairly different cell loss rates for the differentiated applications (differences of several orders of magnitude are achievable).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Threshold-based Push-out and Probabilistic Push-out schemes [7] have been found to provide more flexibility in tuning the cell loss probability but their implementation seems to be complex while still having the restriction that the class with strict cell loss requirement is the one with the low cell delay requirement. Comparisons between various space-priority schemes are presented in [8][9][10]. It turns out that such schemes are fairly effective in inducing fairly different cell loss rates for the differentiated applications (differences of several orders of magnitude are achievable).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…has extended this analysis to the two class model with shared buffer. Finally, we mention that a performance model with partial buffer sharing has been analyzed by Kroner (1990).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They observe a tagged low priority packet from joining until leaving the system and derive the probabilities that this packet will either be served or discarded from the system. Kroner [7] presents a method to compute the loss probabilities of an MI, MZ/G/l/N push-out system with FIFO service discipline. He considers three different space priority mechanisms, namely, push-out scheme, partial buffer sharing, and the scheme with a separate route for each traffic class, and determines the push-out scheme as the best scheme in terms of loss probabilities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%