Comparative performance of X-ray diffraction and Raman microprobe techniques for the study of carbon materials

Facile preparation of hierarchically porous carbon using diatomite as both template and catalyst and methylene blue adsorption of carbon products

“…1), attributed to the (0 0 2) and (1 0 0) reflections of the graphite, respectively. The d (002) value is traditionally used to estimate the graphitization degree of the carbon [8,[26][27][28][29]. The d (002) values, 0.382 nm for Dt(JL) and 0.388 nm for C/Dt(SD), are larger than that of the ideal graphite (0.335 nm) [8].…”

A molecular model for carbon black primary particles with internal nanoporosity

“…Later on, efforts have been put to refine the estimation of the crystalline dimensions by combining XRD with Raman spectrum using an empirical formula developed by Tuinstra and Koenig [25]. Systematic characterization studies of a wide range of carbon materials have been performed to examine the validity of Tuinstra and Koenig's method and recommend feasible measurements for carbon characterizations [26,27].…”

Electrocatalytic Water Oxidation by MnOx/C: In Situ Catalyst Formation, Carbon Substrate Variations, and Direct O2/CO2 Monitoring by Membrane‐Inlet Mass Spectrometry

“…The latter correlates with the fraction of sp 3 -hybridized carbon atoms. [56,57] R Raman is known to be ag ood indicator for both the crystallite sizes as well as the degrees of order for graphitic carbon samples. [56][57][58][59] For the carbon supports used in this study, R Raman varies significantly (Table 1): only very small D-bands could be detected for GS and CFP,i ndicating their graphite-like characteristics.…”