2012
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001244
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative Performance of Private and Public Healthcare Systems in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review

Abstract: A systematic review conducted by Sanjay Basu and colleagues reevaluates the evidence relating to comparative performance of public versus private sector healthcare delivery in low- and middle-income countries.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

24
441
5
20

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 552 publications
(490 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
24
441
5
20
Order By: Relevance
“…It is also possible that because private for-profit facilities need to maximize their profit, private facilities are more likely than public facilities to be more responsive in order to attract more clients. A systematic review of public and private healthcare systems’ performance in LMICs suggested that public health facilities lack timeliness and hospitality to patients [44]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is also possible that because private for-profit facilities need to maximize their profit, private facilities are more likely than public facilities to be more responsive in order to attract more clients. A systematic review of public and private healthcare systems’ performance in LMICs suggested that public health facilities lack timeliness and hospitality to patients [44]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This meant that the majority of those receiving services from the government-owned institutions were the poor. This entails the risk of ‘poor services for poor people’, although a clear difference between the sectors in terms of quality or efficiency cannot be shown [38]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the perspective of UHC, we are interested in the extent to which the presence of private providers impacts on overall efficiency, and hence on the extent to which a given level of health expenditure can cover a population with a range of services. A number of studies, focusing on the treatment of specific conditions, suggest that private treatment results in higher service costs, and thus potential inefficiency (3,5,18,19). Higher rates of potentially unnecessary and expensive procedures, such as caesarean sections, are one source of higher costs (18).…”
Section: Efficiencymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The heterogeneity and complexity of the sector make any judgement about performance complex and nuanced (2). Despite these difficulties, a number of studies have attempted to assess private sector performance usually through comparisons with the public sector (3,4). Most focus on specific types of private providers and discuss factors which influence prov performance, but overall conclusion regarding such factors is challenging.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%