2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.seta.2021.101541
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative Performance and parametric study of solar still: A review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 230 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The average volume of water produced from conventional solar still is 0.8 liters per hour of sun per meter square. [10]. In 2014, globally the cost of freshwater from solar distiller ranged between 0.019$/m 3 and 0.02$/m 3 depending on the shape of the still [11].…”
Section: Solar Distillationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The average volume of water produced from conventional solar still is 0.8 liters per hour of sun per meter square. [10]. In 2014, globally the cost of freshwater from solar distiller ranged between 0.019$/m 3 and 0.02$/m 3 depending on the shape of the still [11].…”
Section: Solar Distillationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the wind speed is increased from 2.7 to 5 m s −1 , productivity is shown to improve by 35%; however, when the temperature is raised from 28 to 32 °C, productivity increases by 53%. Singh et al (2021) stated that there are contrasting findings on the effects of wind on the productivity of SS. With an increase in solar intensity, SS productivity is also increasing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Researchers across world progress in improving the productivity of passive and active solar stills by adopting different techniques that in uences the rate of evaporation and rate of condensation of solar stills (Manokar et al, 2014). Singh et al, (2021) reviewed the design, operational and environmental characteristics on solar still performance. Performance enhancement techniques associated with new designs and modi cations in a passive solar still were reviewed by Mohsenzadeh et al, (2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%