2007
DOI: 10.1093/jmedent/44.5.881
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative Performance and Complementarity of Four Sampling Methods and Arthropod Preference Tests from Human and Porcine Remains at the Forensic Anthropology Center in Knoxville, Tennessee

Abstract: Comparative performance and complementarity tests of four arthropod sampling methods (aerial netting, hand collection, pitfall traps, and sticky traps), used by forensic entomologists in death investigations, training workshops, and research trials, were conducted from simultaneously placed human and porcine subjects inside the Forensic Anthropology Center at the University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN. A secondary aim investigated the widely held claim that pig carcasses are reliable surrogates for human corps… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
48
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 95 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
2
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since all individuals were decomposing at the same time in relatively close proximity, insect activity was comparable between them. While a comprehensive survey of arthropod communities was not included as a part of this study, we did observe extensive activity by Calliphoridae larvae, as has been previously documented at this facility (Schoenly et al, 2007). …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…Since all individuals were decomposing at the same time in relatively close proximity, insect activity was comparable between them. While a comprehensive survey of arthropod communities was not included as a part of this study, we did observe extensive activity by Calliphoridae larvae, as has been previously documented at this facility (Schoenly et al, 2007). …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…Domestic pig ( Sus scrofa domesticus L.) (25 kg) was used to surrogate human models mainly for physiological, biochemical, ethical, legal and economic reasons [25], [40][45]. Unlike other animals, pigs are considered to be an acceptable substitute due to their similarity to humans in body mass (torso in weight), skin structure, fat to muscle ratio and hair coverage [5], [25], [45][46].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unlike other animals, pigs are considered to be an acceptable substitute due to their similarity to humans in body mass (torso in weight), skin structure, fat to muscle ratio and hair coverage [5], [25], [45][46]. The greatest dissimilarity between pigs and humans are the bones, which have a different microstructure [46][47].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Significant work using human cadavers has been conducted at the Anthropological Research Facility of the University of Tennessee at Knoxville. Among these are the early work by Rodriguez (1986) specifically looking at insect activity associated with decomposing bodies and later work by Schoenly et al [23]. As early as 1989, the domestic pig was suggested as being a standard surrogate for humans in decomposition studies and this was reinforced by work by Schoenly et al [23].…”
Section: Decompositionmentioning
confidence: 99%