2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijleo.2016.11.055
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative performance analysis of various wavelet and nonlocal means based approaches for image denoising

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
15
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The traditional Bayes shrink threshold T B is defined as follows TB=normalδ2normalδx2 where normalδ2 and normalδx2 are the noise variance and signal variance, respectively. The formulas are defined as δ=median|xi,jtrue(l,ktrue)|0.6745 normalδx=maxtrue(1mni=1mj=1nxi,j2true(l,ktrue)normalδ2, 0true) where m and n represent the image, which has the size of m × n , and x i , j ( l , k ) is the coefficient at ( i , j ) in the l th level and k th direction.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The traditional Bayes shrink threshold T B is defined as follows TB=normalδ2normalδx2 where normalδ2 and normalδx2 are the noise variance and signal variance, respectively. The formulas are defined as δ=median|xi,jtrue(l,ktrue)|0.6745 normalδx=maxtrue(1mni=1mj=1nxi,j2true(l,ktrue)normalδ2, 0true) where m and n represent the image, which has the size of m × n , and x i , j ( l , k ) is the coefficient at ( i , j ) in the l th level and k th direction.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, it is necessary to reduce the noise and filter the acquired images for subsequent processing and image accuracy. Because of the substantial saltand-pepper noise in SEM images, a median filter is employed in this study to effectively eliminate the noise (Erkan et al 2018;Singh et al 2017;Vijaykumar et al 2014). (2) Image enhancement: In cases of insufficient exposure or excessive exposure, the gray levels in an image can be limited, causing problems in pore recognition and analysis.…”
Section: Digital Image Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many denoising methods for MRI have been proposed in the literature, these methods can be divided into three major classes [ 11 , 12 ]: (1) filtering techniques include linear filters (i.e., spatial and temporal methods) and non-linear filters (i.e., anisotropic diffusion filtering (ADF) -based methods) [ 10 ], 4th order partial differential equation (PDE) –based methods, non-local means (NLM) –based methods [ 13 ] and combination of domain and range filters (i.e., bilateral and trilateral filters); (2) transform domain methods, this class consider the curvelet and the contourlet transforms [ 14 , 15 ] and the wavelet transform based methods (i.e., wavelet thresholding, wavelet domain filter, wavelet packet analysis, adaptive multiscale product thresholding, multiwavelet and undecimated wavelet) [ 7 , 12 , 16 ]; (3) Statistical methods such as maximum likelihood estimation approach [ 17 ], Bayesian approach [ 18 ], linear minimum mean square error estimation approach, phase error estimation approach, nonparametric neighborhood statistics/estimation approach and singularity function analysis [ 11 , 18 , 19 ]. Additionally, there exist some hybrid methodologies that belong to both NLM-based methods and Statistical approaches [ 20 , 21 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%