2017
DOI: 10.1504/ijmndi.2017.089305
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative performance analysis of different resource scheduler and characterising the impact of proportional fair under different TTI feedback delay in EUTRA network

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The conventional proportional fair (PF) scheduler is considered to be from the first category, ie, channel‐aware QoS‐unaware. However, it is considered to be the most commonly known scheduling strategy when dealing with none‐RT (NRT) traffic . The PF scheduler achieves a high level of fairness with an acceptable overall system throughput.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The conventional proportional fair (PF) scheduler is considered to be from the first category, ie, channel‐aware QoS‐unaware. However, it is considered to be the most commonly known scheduling strategy when dealing with none‐RT (NRT) traffic . The PF scheduler achieves a high level of fairness with an acceptable overall system throughput.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it is considered to be the most commonly known scheduling strategy when dealing with none-RT (NRT) traffic. [24][25][26] The PF scheduler achieves a high level of fairness with an acceptable overall system throughput. Obviously, the PF scheduler cannot support the RT traffic over the LTE cellular system.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [8], the authors discuss an analysis of cell re-selection procedure followed in LTE and concluded that the SNR played an important role in channel allocation to UE.The authors in [9], [10] using system-level simulations compare the performance of five different media access control (MAC) scheduler under uniform LTE (EUTRAN) network in terms of key performance indicators (KPIs) for cell and UE. In [11], [12], authors discuss on the performance of proportional fair MAC scheduler over a feedback delay for EUTRAN.…”
Section: Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, to obtain the PSD for fractional power control at the receiving end, PSD RX , as given in (12), is modified to give:…”
Section: Link-adaptation In Lte 21 Uplink Power Control Mechanismmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation