2018
DOI: 10.1109/tro.2018.2791591
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative Peg-in-Hole Testing of a Force-Based Manipulation Controlled Robotic Hand

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Evaluations can be used to drive standards, which are used to set a minimum acceptable level of performance across an industry and potentially create a commercial and performance advantage [11][12][13]. Unfortunately, general system performance standards for larger platforms have not yet been fully developed, primarily due to a lack of consensus within the robotic system community; some problem areas include disagreement on the definition of system intelligence [14][15][16][17][18], a lack of concurrence on general robotic system functional and performance requirements [19][20][21][22][23], and the lack of general and widely-applicable definitions of appropriate metrics to assess and characterize behavior capabilities [24][25][26][27].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Evaluations can be used to drive standards, which are used to set a minimum acceptable level of performance across an industry and potentially create a commercial and performance advantage [11][12][13]. Unfortunately, general system performance standards for larger platforms have not yet been fully developed, primarily due to a lack of consensus within the robotic system community; some problem areas include disagreement on the definition of system intelligence [14][15][16][17][18], a lack of concurrence on general robotic system functional and performance requirements [19][20][21][22][23], and the lack of general and widely-applicable definitions of appropriate metrics to assess and characterize behavior capabilities [24][25][26][27].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These points, called target points, are not used for registration and, in principle, they are measured only in the working frame. Example applications that leverage target points include peg-in-hole insertions [1], robotic welding and Cartesian path planning [2], obtaining hand-eye coordination [3], and grasp planning [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 and a registration calculated using the RRBC method. A simple Pass/Fail metric was used to 1 TRE is the preferred metric for quantifying the quality of registration as opposed to FRE since TRE is the error at target points which are points of interest to practitioners. However, TRE requires measurement of the targets in the destination frame which may not be possible.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A alternative approach to deal with uncertainties while performing manipulation tasks is to plan the geometric motions of the objects and then execute these motions on a compliant robot. This simple approach has proved to be a key component for the success of many manipulation tasks [Suárez-Ruiz et al, 2018, Knepper et al, 2013, Wahrburg et al, 2014, Van Wyk et al, 2018. To compute robust motions under the presence of motion and sensing uncertainties, many works have incorporated such information into their planners [Phillips-Grain and Berenson, 2017, Sieverling et al, 2017, Wirnshofer et al, 2018.…”
Section: Motivationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore compliant motions play an important role for a safe and successful interaction between robots in uncertain environment. Compliant motions has enabled many works to reliably perform part insertions, for example [Van Wyk et al, 2018, Suárez-Ruiz et al, 2018. On the other side, one can also use compliant motions to maintain contact with a object to reduce sensing time during the data collection of touch-based localization problem.…”
Section: Compliant Motionsmentioning
confidence: 99%