2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijms.2006.09.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative parallel characterization of particle populations with two mass spectrometric systems LAMPAS 2 and SPASS

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
31
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
3
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recent examples of the application of this instrument include source apportionment and mixing-state studies in urban environments (Healy et al, 2012;Dall'Osto et al, 2014;Giorio et al, 2015), the study of the atmospheric ageing of min-eral dust during long-range transport (Sullivan et al, 2007;Dall'Osto et al, 2010;Fitzgerald et al, 2015), and the characterisation of particles of low number concentration in the Arctic (Sierau et al, 2014). The direct comparison of the response of single-particle instruments with different designs (Middlebrook et al, 2003;Hinz et al, 2006) highlights the need to consider the factors that affect particle counting statistics in SPMS.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent examples of the application of this instrument include source apportionment and mixing-state studies in urban environments (Healy et al, 2012;Dall'Osto et al, 2014;Giorio et al, 2015), the study of the atmospheric ageing of min-eral dust during long-range transport (Sullivan et al, 2007;Dall'Osto et al, 2010;Fitzgerald et al, 2015), and the characterisation of particles of low number concentration in the Arctic (Sierau et al, 2014). The direct comparison of the response of single-particle instruments with different designs (Middlebrook et al, 2003;Hinz et al, 2006) highlights the need to consider the factors that affect particle counting statistics in SPMS.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The outcome of the analysis can be affected by the choice of clustering algorithm and the pre-processing of the raw data (Rebotier and Prather, 2007), which should be considered when interpreting the data. In addition, instrument design features, such as ablation laser wavelength, can result in different spectral patterns for similar particle types (Hinz et al, 2006), so that some caution must be applied when comparing the results from one single particle mass spectrometer with those of another. For this study, we utilised the fuzzy c means algorithm that is provided in the LAAP-TOF Data Analysis software (v 1.0.2) provided by the original equipment manufacturer (AeroMegt GmbH).…”
Section: S2 Cluster Analysis Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The clusters are then automatically grouped into a cluster tree by a hierarchical analysis performed within MAT-LAB which is displayed in the dendroFATES GUI window. Hierarchical analyses have been utilized previously with SPMS data sets (Giorio et al, 2012;Hinz et al, 2006;Murphy et al, 2003;Rebotier and Prather, 2007;Zelenyuk et al, 2006), but a brief description is given here. The dendrogram links clusters in a binary fashion, creating new groups which are then further linked.…”
Section: Dendrofates: Hierarchical Cluster Relationsmentioning
confidence: 99%