2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2016.07.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative Outcome Analysis of Arthroscopic-Assisted Versus Open Reduction and Fixation of Trans-scaphoid Perilunate Fracture Dislocations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
21
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
21
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In 2017, our research team reported on 11 dorsal TSPLFDs treated with arthroscopic-assisted reduction and internal fixation and nine patients with ORIF through a dorsal approach who were reviewed at an average of 2-year follow-up [60]. Though a small number of patients and a low statistical power were limitations, this was the first retrospective comparative study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In 2017, our research team reported on 11 dorsal TSPLFDs treated with arthroscopic-assisted reduction and internal fixation and nine patients with ORIF through a dorsal approach who were reviewed at an average of 2-year follow-up [60]. Though a small number of patients and a low statistical power were limitations, this was the first retrospective comparative study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other arthroscopic studies stated that arthritis did not occur, but the follow-up period was shorter [18,55]. The incidence of radiologic arthritis and clinical outcomes are not proportional, and longer follow-up is required to evaluate this issue [53,60].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…functions-a marker of return to work and daily activities. Because of the various surgical approaches and procedures of treatment, the literature reports varying wrist grip strengths from 67 %-81,1 %compared with the contralateral side 2,15,18 . In the current study, upon evaluation of grip strength by using the Jamar device, the grip strength of the operated wrist was measured as 80 %compared with the contralateral side.…”
Section: Disclaimer: Nonementioning
confidence: 99%