1975
DOI: 10.1016/0022-474x(75)90022-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative observations on the activity of purethroids against some susceptible and resistant stored products beetles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1980
1980
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The first detection of resistance was reported in a laboratory S. oryzae strain (CSO231) derived from a field strain collected in Western Australia, with resistance at 6x that of a susceptible reference strain (Champ and Dyte, 1976). Carter et al (1975) then showed no resistance to fenitrothion in the CSO231 strain when applying another testing method of the dusted grain with fenitrothion instead of the impregnated paper method previously used by Champ and Dyte. Resistance then was detected in 53% and 73% of field strains in Queensland with low level of resistance, from 2 to 4 times compared to the reference susceptible strain (Collins and Wilson, 1986).…”
Section: Resistance To Organophosphatesmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The first detection of resistance was reported in a laboratory S. oryzae strain (CSO231) derived from a field strain collected in Western Australia, with resistance at 6x that of a susceptible reference strain (Champ and Dyte, 1976). Carter et al (1975) then showed no resistance to fenitrothion in the CSO231 strain when applying another testing method of the dusted grain with fenitrothion instead of the impregnated paper method previously used by Champ and Dyte. Resistance then was detected in 53% and 73% of field strains in Queensland with low level of resistance, from 2 to 4 times compared to the reference susceptible strain (Collins and Wilson, 1986).…”
Section: Resistance To Organophosphatesmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Surprisingly, Carter et al (1975) also used the same strain from Australia but found no resistance to most tested pyrethroids such as pyrethrins (-/+PB), bioresmethrin (-/+PB), cismethrin (-/+PB). The LC 50s of the susceptible strain were even higher than the values of the resistant strain.…”
Section: Resistance To Synthetic Pyrethroidsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Effectiveness of natural pyrethrins with and without piperonyl butoxide has been well documented for major stored‐product beetles12–14 and mites 15. Although natural pyrethrins have been evaluated against L. bostrychophila and L. entomophila on treated concrete surfaces,16 this paper reports for the first time the potential of PB‐synergised pyrethrins as a grain protectant and as a disinfestant against psocid pests of stored products.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A formulation of piperonyl butoxide (PB)‐synergised natural pyrethrins (pyrethrin:PB ratio 1:4) has recently been registered in Australia for use against a range of agricultural pests including stored‐grain beetles, but the current registration limits its use to application as a space spray and to fabric treatment of buildings and storage structures. Information on the effectiveness of natural pyrethrins alone and of pyrethrins synergised with PB against major stored‐product beetles12–14 and mites15 is available in the literature. However, information on the efficacy of pyrethrins against psocid pests of stored grain is limited to an evaluation of the performance of pyrethrins alone as a surface treatment against L. bostrychophila and L. entomophila 16.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These data were found to be similar to data reported in the literature. Carter et al (1975) found the LC9S of mal dis on mixed with grain was 1. 71 ppm and McCallum Deighton (1978) found the minimum effective dose (M.E.D.-the lowest concentration which kills all adults when continuously exposed to the treated grain) was 1-3 ppm.…”
Section: Distribution Of Dust Through Grainmentioning
confidence: 97%