2019
DOI: 10.17736/ijope.2019.jc754
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative Numerical Study on Focusing Wave Interaction with FPSO-like Structure

Abstract: Evaluating the interactions between offshore structures and extreme waves plays an essential role for securing the survivability of the structures. For this purpose, various numerical tools, e.g. the fully nonlinear potential theory (FNPT), the Navier-Stokes (NS) models and hybrid approaches combining different numerical models, have been developed and ultilised. However, there is still a great uncertainty over the required level of model fidelity when being applied to a wide range of wave-structure interactio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…StarCCM+ and CFX by Westphalen et al, 2008Westphalen et al, , 2010 and open-source codes such as the OpenFOAM (Brown et al, 2014(Brown et al, , 2015Chen et al, 2014;Hu et al, 2014Hu et al, , 2016Hu et al, , 2017, for numerical modelling the WSIs in an extreme sea. These codes were developed for either single-phase (Lind et al, 2012;Zheng et al, 2014) or multi-phase (Chen et al, 2014;Hildebrandt and Sriram, 2014;Yan et al, 2015;Hu et al, 2016;Lind et al, 2016) flow and considered either incompressible (Yang et al, 2016;Yan et al, 2019), compressible (Yang et al, 2017) or partially compressible fluids, in which the air is compressible and the water incompressible (e.g. Lind et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…StarCCM+ and CFX by Westphalen et al, 2008Westphalen et al, , 2010 and open-source codes such as the OpenFOAM (Brown et al, 2014(Brown et al, , 2015Chen et al, 2014;Hu et al, 2014Hu et al, , 2016Hu et al, , 2017, for numerical modelling the WSIs in an extreme sea. These codes were developed for either single-phase (Lind et al, 2012;Zheng et al, 2014) or multi-phase (Chen et al, 2014;Hildebrandt and Sriram, 2014;Yan et al, 2015;Hu et al, 2016;Lind et al, 2016) flow and considered either incompressible (Yang et al, 2016;Yan et al, 2019), compressible (Yang et al, 2017) or partially compressible fluids, in which the air is compressible and the water incompressible (e.g. Lind et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the Reynolds Average NS (Yang et al, 2016) and the Large-eddy simulation (LES, e.g. Xie, 2012Xie, , 2013Xie, , 2015Yan et al, 2019), dealing with the velocity-pressure coupling, e.g. the fractional step method (Rijas et al, 2019) and PIMPLE/PISO (Hu et al, 2014(Hu et al, , 2016(Hu et al, , 2017 , modelling the motions of the floating bodies, e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One conclusion given by Ransley et al (2019) is that FNPT methods have performed equally as well as the high fidelity methods; the FEM-based FNPT method, i.e. the Quasi Lagrangian Eulerian Finite Element Method (QALE-FEM, Ma & Yan, 2006,2009Yan & Ma, 2007;Ma et al 2015), is at least 1.5 orders of magnitude faster than the quickest NS code and has comparable predictive capability in these cases (Ransley et al 2019), where the viscous and the turbulent effects are insignificant (Yan and Xie et al 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…with NS solvers, including the qaleFOAM combing the QALE-FEM with openFOAM(Li et al, 2018;Yan et al 2019;Yan et al 2020) and a one-way hybrid model combining the FNPT with SPH(Zhang et al 2020), demonstrate a potential improvement in the required CPU effort when compared to the most robust NS solvers participating to the test, including one adopting the linear and second-order wave condition in the OpenFOAM (wave2Foam, Jacobsen et al 2011) . It is admitted that the implementations of different numerical models, e.g.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%