2017
DOI: 10.1055/s-0036-1597986
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative Neurologic Outcomes of Salvage and Definitive Gamma Knife Radiosurgery for Glomus Jugulare: A 20-Year Experience

Abstract: This case series investigates management of glomus jugulare (GJ) tumors utilizing definitive and salvage Gamma Knife stereotactic radiosurgery (GKSRS). A retrospective chart review was performed to collect data. Statistical analysis included patient, tumor, and treatment information. From 1996 to 2013, 17 patients with GJ received GKSRS. Median age was 64 years (range, 27-76). GKSRS was delivered for definitive treatment in eight (47%) and salvage in nine (53%) patients. Median tumor volume was 9.8 cm (range, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
2
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This study adds to the body of literature supporting the use of GKRS alone as an upfront definitive management of GJTs [1][2]. This analysis confirms that GKRS effectively treats GJTs with excellent long-term tumor control.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 69%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…This study adds to the body of literature supporting the use of GKRS alone as an upfront definitive management of GJTs [1][2]. This analysis confirms that GKRS effectively treats GJTs with excellent long-term tumor control.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…Also, only one patient endured a recurrence five years after surgery. This study had no operative complications or mortality [2].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Although quite a few case series demonstrating the effects of gamma knife treatment to HNPGs exist [14,20,8,19], CKT evidence for these tumors still need to be accumulated especially long-term results [1]. We believe that our series of 29 cases, although the number of cases are not as many as some previous studies, the relatively longer median follow-up period of 66 months (15 cases were followed for more than ve years) adds further valuable data to the current literature.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%