2016
DOI: 10.1007/s13196-016-0174-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative natural durability of four Mediterranean softwoods against wood decay fungi

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to their durability indexes (X) determined by NF EN 350-1 and CEN/TS 15083-1 standards [22,23] and the biological risks defined by EN 335-2 standard [24], natural durability levels of those woods against wooddecaying fungi allow them to access high-risk classes of biological attacks 4 and 5 for an end-use without preservative treatment regarding decay fungi [25,26]. Compared to similar studies on Moroccan coniferous woods (Figure 1), the natural durability of native Atlas cedar wood is similar to that of C. atlantica heartwood (DC 1 and 2) originated from a south Italian plantation [7], whereas Pinus halepensis and P. pinaster woods were considered as less durable (DC 4) [6,27]. Generally, pine woods contain less active extractives than those of Cupressaceae.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…According to their durability indexes (X) determined by NF EN 350-1 and CEN/TS 15083-1 standards [22,23] and the biological risks defined by EN 335-2 standard [24], natural durability levels of those woods against wooddecaying fungi allow them to access high-risk classes of biological attacks 4 and 5 for an end-use without preservative treatment regarding decay fungi [25,26]. Compared to similar studies on Moroccan coniferous woods (Figure 1), the natural durability of native Atlas cedar wood is similar to that of C. atlantica heartwood (DC 1 and 2) originated from a south Italian plantation [7], whereas Pinus halepensis and P. pinaster woods were considered as less durable (DC 4) [6,27]. Generally, pine woods contain less active extractives than those of Cupressaceae.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Laboratory tests showed that T. articulata trunk wood and its root burl are durable against wood-decaying fungi [5,6] as well as C. atlantica heartwood [6][7][8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Maritime pine sapwood (Pinus pinaster var atlantica Ait) is considered as non-durable against fungal decay (Fidah et al, 2016b). Boards, of 1 m length having 25 mm × 15 mm of section, of maritime pine sapwood were taken from logs of 36 years old trees originated from the Maamora plantation (North-West of Morocco, 34 07'N -6 36'W).…”
Section: Preparation Of Test Specimensmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…T. articulata has a long history of usage due to its wood quality, durability, and the ornamental value of the tree [2][3][4][5]. Additionally, it has been traditionally exploited as a source of sandarac resin [6,7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%