2006
DOI: 10.1080/14620316.2006.11512147
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative movement of labelled nitrogen and zinc in 1-year-old peach [Prunus persica(L.) Batsch] trees following late-season foliar application

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
10
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However, in contrast to the present research findings, in oak [10] and peach trees [11] substantial retranslocation of Zn during senescence was reported. Also Sanchez et al [16] found a retranslocation of foliar applied Zn before leaf fall. However, this retranslocation was with 5e7% of leaf absorbed Zn relative small.…”
Section: Retranslocation Of Other Micronutrients (Zn Mn Cu B) In Tmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…However, in contrast to the present research findings, in oak [10] and peach trees [11] substantial retranslocation of Zn during senescence was reported. Also Sanchez et al [16] found a retranslocation of foliar applied Zn before leaf fall. However, this retranslocation was with 5e7% of leaf absorbed Zn relative small.…”
Section: Retranslocation Of Other Micronutrients (Zn Mn Cu B) In Tmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Our understanding of the factors that determine the ultimate efficacy of foliar applications remains poor and the response of plants to foliar Zn applications is highly variable (Fernández and Brown, 2013). Many reports indicate that foliar application of Zn may significantly increase the concentrations of Zn in the applied leaves but may have little effect on foliar concentrations in non-sprayed tissues or tissue that develop subsequent to the foliar application (Zhang and Brown, 1999; Mirzapour and Khoshgoftar, 2006; Sanchez et al, 2006). The factors that control the uptake and subsequent translocation of foliar applied nutrients out of the leaf, and the effect of spray formulation on these processes are poorly understood (Bukovac, 1985; Adamec, 2013; Fernández and Brown, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The factors that control the uptake and subsequent translocation of foliar applied nutrients out of the leaf, and the effect of spray formulation on these processes are poorly understood (Bukovac, 1985; Adamec, 2013; Fernández and Brown, 2013). While various approaches have been used to determine the efficacy of foliar applied nutrients using stable and radioactive isotopic labeling (Wittwer and Teubner, 1959; Bukovac, 1985; Sah and Brown, 1998; Boaretto et al, 2001; Sanchez et al, 2006), it remains challenging to determine the pathways of mobilization from leaf to shoot and to monitor the influence of foliar formulation on phloem loading and micronutrient transport.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This may be because a decrease in the concentrations of relative immobile nutrients Cu and Fe occurred during the dry hydrological cycle 2005/2006 ( Barker and Pilbeam 2007;Correia et al 2008). On the other hand, once within peach trees Zn is quite mobile (Sanchez, Weinbaum, and Johnson 2006), and it had also greater concentrations in plant tissues in year 1 compared to year 2. The result can be probably a dilution effect because in year 2, fruit yield was relatively greater and reproductive and vegetative growth was more vigorous.…”
Section: Concentrations Of N P K Mg Fe Zn Mn and Cu In Plant Timentioning
confidence: 99%