2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jconhyd.2015.06.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative modeling of an in situ diffusion experiment in granite at the Grimsel Test Site

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, such idealizations do not capture hydraulic properties of fractured aquifers at HRFS for many applications (e.g., in situ remediation). Detailed investigations at fractured‐rock research sites (e.g., Grimsel, Aspö) have provided exceptional access to 3D rock exposures supplemented by coreholes and extensive hydrologic, tracer, and geophysical tests (e.g., Martinez‐Landa and Carrera , ; Mettier et al ; Gustafson et al and papers cited within; Soler et al ). Yet, this information has not led to generally accepted methods for estimating fracture distributions to predict hydraulic and transport behavior.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, such idealizations do not capture hydraulic properties of fractured aquifers at HRFS for many applications (e.g., in situ remediation). Detailed investigations at fractured‐rock research sites (e.g., Grimsel, Aspö) have provided exceptional access to 3D rock exposures supplemented by coreholes and extensive hydrologic, tracer, and geophysical tests (e.g., Martinez‐Landa and Carrera , ; Mettier et al ; Gustafson et al and papers cited within; Soler et al ). Yet, this information has not led to generally accepted methods for estimating fracture distributions to predict hydraulic and transport behavior.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can be seen that the fit fails to explain the late part of the in‐diffusion profile which extends further than the fit to the early part predicts. Similar challenges were faced when analyzing the in‐diffusion profiles from the LTD experiment and the analysis could not be performed using homogeneous models (Jokelainen et al, ; Soler et al, ; Tachi et al, ). The overall shape of the profiles is similar but modeled ones do not extend as far as the ones from the LTD experiment.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the in situ test of the LTD experiment at the GTS, the initial activity concentration of 134 Cs was 540 Bq/g (Soler et al, ) which is equal to a molar concentration of 8.4×1011 M . As the concentration of stable cesium in Grimsel ground water is 5.3×109 M (Aksoyoglu et al, ), the increase in concentration of cesium due to injected 134 Cs can be neglected and simulations could be performed in a constant concentration of 5.3×109 M , and thus constant values for K d were chosen accordingly (see Table when simulating the in‐diffusion profiles in in situ conditions).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations