Abstract:It is widely known that resonance can quickly lead to failure in vibrating bolted flanged pipe joints. Condition monitoring is performed time to time in some industries for smooth operation of a system, whereas mostly trial-and-error tests are performed to control vibration. During all this process, the inherent design problems are not considered. A bolted flange joint in piping system is not a simple problem, being the combination of flange, gasket, bolts, and washers. The success of a bolted flanged pipe joi… Show more
“…In a gasketed joint, the presence of the gasket and rotation of flanges results in joint relaxation and improper preloading of the bolts. In addition to this, gasket crushing and flange yielding limits higher pre-load [1,[15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34]. Bolt quality and proper tooling has been proven to be important factors in getting proper pre-load in the joint [1].…”
Loss of pre-load with time, commonly known as ‘Relaxation’ is an established phenomena. Behaviour of a bolted joint depends upon the pre-load in the bolts in use, not the pre-load introduced by the mechanic. Loss of pre-load is expected due to the many factors such as embedment relaxation, gasket creep, elastic interactions, and vibration loosening or stress relaxation. In a gasketed joint, due to the gasket flexibility, relaxation is always substantial during preliminary passes, as 80 to 100% loss is not uncommon in almost all the bolts, resulting in a dynamic behaviour. Pre-load in a gasketed joint is stabilized and retained to certain extent in the final passes only. In a non-gasketed joint, due to no gasket and no rotation its static behaviour is concluded. This paper highlights the factors affecting the amount of relaxation with time and presents important considerations that can reduce this. Both the short and long term relaxations are recorded and a ‘best fit’ model for relaxation behaviour is derived.
“…In a gasketed joint, the presence of the gasket and rotation of flanges results in joint relaxation and improper preloading of the bolts. In addition to this, gasket crushing and flange yielding limits higher pre-load [1,[15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34]. Bolt quality and proper tooling has been proven to be important factors in getting proper pre-load in the joint [1].…”
Loss of pre-load with time, commonly known as ‘Relaxation’ is an established phenomena. Behaviour of a bolted joint depends upon the pre-load in the bolts in use, not the pre-load introduced by the mechanic. Loss of pre-load is expected due to the many factors such as embedment relaxation, gasket creep, elastic interactions, and vibration loosening or stress relaxation. In a gasketed joint, due to the gasket flexibility, relaxation is always substantial during preliminary passes, as 80 to 100% loss is not uncommon in almost all the bolts, resulting in a dynamic behaviour. Pre-load in a gasketed joint is stabilized and retained to certain extent in the final passes only. In a non-gasketed joint, due to no gasket and no rotation its static behaviour is concluded. This paper highlights the factors affecting the amount of relaxation with time and presents important considerations that can reduce this. Both the short and long term relaxations are recorded and a ‘best fit’ model for relaxation behaviour is derived.
“…Gasketed flanged pipe joints are considered prone to failure, in terms of strength and sealing capability, during bolt up and operating conditions of even internal pressure loading only. [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19] Their performance can be worse under combined loading applications. 1,[3][4][5][6]8,[10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17] However, it is also reported that a gasketed joint can perform well provided the joint assembly is made properly and with great care, which may be possible in a controlled laboratory environment but cannot be ensured in the field applications.…”
Section: Introduction and Experimental Setupmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19] Their performance can be worse under combined loading applications. 1,[3][4][5][6]8,[10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17] However, it is also reported that a gasketed joint can perform well provided the joint assembly is made properly and with great care, which may be possible in a controlled laboratory environment but cannot be ensured in the field applications. 1,[3][4][5]11,[13][14][15]17 Although certain numerically studies were performed under combined pressure and different (static and transient) thermal loadings up to 400 • C, 6,8,12,16,[20][21][22]…”
Section: Introduction and Experimental Setupmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1,[3][4][5][6]8,[10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17] However, it is also reported that a gasketed joint can perform well provided the joint assembly is made properly and with great care, which may be possible in a controlled laboratory environment but cannot be ensured in the field applications. 1,[3][4][5]11,[13][14][15]17 Although certain numerically studies were performed under combined pressure and different (static and transient) thermal loadings up to 400 • C, 6,8,12,16,[20][21][22][23][24] a limited number of experimental studies are available for the testing of bolted flanged pipe joints under combined pressure and thermal loading. [21][22][23] Helium leak tests are normally conducted at low pressure and room temperature; Sawa et al 23 have reported the helium leak testing of a gasketed bolted flange joint (GBFJ) assembly under a combined pressure of 5 MPa and temperature of 200 • C and have discussed the performance of the bolted flanged pipe joint.…”
Section: Introduction and Experimental Setupmentioning
“…Os autores concluíram que a configuração na forma de U da o melhor desempenho com taxa de vazamento não mensurável sob carga aplicada representada em termos de tensão global de 0,67 Mpa. Foi feita análise de tensão usando o método de elementos finitos com a ferramenta ABAQUS®, e se conclui que o projeto da ranhura em U tem o melhor desempenho de vedação Abid et al (2012). apresentam resultados detalhados de análise modal por elementos finitos 3D e análise modal matemática para determinar as frequências naturais e modos de vibrar de junções flangeadas, para junta de vedação, com e sem rebaixo na face; fazendo a comparação com junção flangeada sem junta de vedação.…”
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.