2022
DOI: 10.1007/s11756-022-01195-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative mitochondrial genomics of tetras: insights into phylogenetic relationships in Characidae

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
2
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2 . The RSCUs analysis of S. grahami showed that codons tended to use more A or T at the third codon, which is consistent with some previous studies 27 , 28 . The dN/dS of the PCGs in the mitogenome of Spirobolus ( S bungii , S. grahami , and S. walkeri ) were calculated, too (Table 4 ).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…2 . The RSCUs analysis of S. grahami showed that codons tended to use more A or T at the third codon, which is consistent with some previous studies 27 , 28 . The dN/dS of the PCGs in the mitogenome of Spirobolus ( S bungii , S. grahami , and S. walkeri ) were calculated, too (Table 4 ).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Since molecular taxonomy usually employs mitochondrial gene sequences to infer phylogenetic relationships [8], we used the sequence of 13 PCGs to improve the understanding of Characidae phylogeny. Our results did not support four genera (Hemigrammus, Hyphessobrycon, Moenkhausia, and Psalidodon) (Figure 6), corroborating the findings of the previous studies [10] and indicating that Hyphessobrycon is not a monophyletic group.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Phylogenetic analysis was performed using the same genomes reported previously [9]. We created a concatenated set of base sequences from 35 species to examine the phylogenetic relationships of the Characidae (see Supplementary Table S1; [10,[23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37]). Geneious ® software (version 9.0.5) was used to generate the alignments [38] and Lebiasina astrigata (Regan, 1903) was used as an outgroup.…”
Section: Phylogenetic Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation