2019
DOI: 10.1063/1.5091288
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative measurements of mixed radiation fields using liulin and AIRDOS dosimeters

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Results obtained with AIRDOS were compared with Liulin dosimeter [7] in selected flight and long term measurement at high mountain observatory [32]. Differences in cumulative dose in silicon measured by Liulin and AIRDOS during the whole measurement campaign were below 10% with systematic error +4.8% [32]. Please note that this comparison was done for deposited energies above 250 keV.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Results obtained with AIRDOS were compared with Liulin dosimeter [7] in selected flight and long term measurement at high mountain observatory [32]. Differences in cumulative dose in silicon measured by Liulin and AIRDOS during the whole measurement campaign were below 10% with systematic error +4.8% [32]. Please note that this comparison was done for deposited energies above 250 keV.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Where 𝑘 Liulin/Airdos = 1.05, it represents different channel width of Liulin and AIRDOS and this systematic difference is estimated as 5% (lowest estimation of this systematic difference is 4.8% by [32]), 𝑘 Sv/Gy = 2.45, it is a mean value of a calibration factor for Liulin by the work [36] for the geomagnetic cutoff rigidities from 3.5 to 8.6 GV. Calculated values for the three AIRDOS devices are displayed in the graphs in figure 10 for the specific flight.…”
Section: Jinst 16 T03006mentioning
confidence: 99%