Concrete as the most commonly used construction material has high compressive strength; however, the main disadvantages associated with concrete are low tensile strength, low cracking resistance, and low ductility, etc. When concrete structures are subjected to dynamic loadings, such as earthquake, impact, and blast, catastrophic failure can occur, which is costly and also induce public risk. The strike of Twin Towers in New York by airplanes in 2001 terrorist attack is a typical example (Soe et al., 2013). Therefore, a proper understanding of the response of concrete material to dynamic loadings is very critical for designing structures correctly.Many researchers have adopted various ways to improve the dynamic behavior of ordinary concrete, of which engineered cementitious composites (ECC) and textile reinforced concrete (TRC) are two effective solutions (Heravi et al., 2020). Engineered cementitious composites (ECC) are ultra-ductile fiber-reinforced cement-based composites, which can provide extraordinary strain-hardening property and good toughness with ultimate tensile strain more than 3%, and also exhibit well in controlling the initiation and growth of cracks (Sakulich and Li, 2011;Kai et al., 2016). In ECC, the commonly used fibers include steel fibers, carbon fibers, polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) fibers, and polyethylene (PE) fibers, etc. Different fiber types can lead to varying reinforcement efficiencies. The high-modulus fibers (e.g., steel and carbon fibers) normally provide high ultimate strength but low strain capacity; however, the low-modulus fibers (e.g., PVA and PE fibers) exhibit the opposite behavior (Maalej et al., 2005). Kai et al. and Mechtcherine et al. indicated that the ECC reinforced with PVA is a strain rate sensitive material, and the strength, energy consumption, and strain at