2010
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2311.2010.01176.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative life‐history traits in a fig wasp community: implications for community structure

Abstract: 1. Whether life‐history traits can determine community composition and structure is an important question that has been well explored theoretically, but has received scant empirical attention. Life‐history traits of a seven‐member community of galler and parasitoid fig wasp species (Chalcidoidea), developing within the inflorescences (syconia) of Ficus racemosa (Moraceae) in India, were determined and used to examine community structure and ecology. 2. Gallers were pro‐ovigenic (all eggs are mature upon adult … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
101
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(106 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
(113 reference statements)
3
101
1
Order By: Relevance
“…While the strength of competition among nonpollinating fig wasps has not been estimated, interspecific competition among nonpollinators should be comparable to that of pollinators where ovule resources are limiting and overlapping (e.g., Ghara et al 2014). Observations from wild populations find that nonpollinators regularly compete with pollinators for access to overlapping ovule resources (e.g., West and Herre 1994;Kerdelhué and Rasplus 1996;West et al 1996;Kerdelhué et al 2000;Ghara and Borges 2010), and experimental manipulations suggest that observational studies likely underestimate competition (Raja et al 2014).…”
Section: Naturalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the strength of competition among nonpollinating fig wasps has not been estimated, interspecific competition among nonpollinators should be comparable to that of pollinators where ovule resources are limiting and overlapping (e.g., Ghara et al 2014). Observations from wild populations find that nonpollinators regularly compete with pollinators for access to overlapping ovule resources (e.g., West and Herre 1994;Kerdelhué and Rasplus 1996;West et al 1996;Kerdelhué et al 2000;Ghara and Borges 2010), and experimental manipulations suggest that observational studies likely underestimate competition (Raja et al 2014).…”
Section: Naturalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, an oft-reported trade-off between competitive ability and longevity will favour the coexistence of species able to achieve quick numerical abundance, and species with slower growth but better persistence through time [15,39]. This mechanism is particularly salient when the environment fluctuates over time [19], but intransitive dynamics mediated by interspecific differences in density-dependent regulation can also maintain the coexistence of competitors with divergent life history strategies along the slow-fast continuum within communities, even in the absence of environmental fluctuations [40]. Note that this coexistence mechanism does not depend on competitors diverging in their resource requirements or resource acquisition abilities.…”
Section: Life History Trade-offs and Coexistencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Empirical evidence from damselflies, plants, parasitoids, fig wasps, fish and Drosophila all indicate that life history divergence is often a critical coexistence mechanism within guilds, where species overlap very closely in specific resource requirement and acquisition traits [14,15,18,19,39,40,43]. Life history traits are also well-characterized mediators of competition and coexistence even among more diffuse competitors [37,44].…”
Section: Life History Trade-offs and Coexistencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…They found variation in fecundity and longevity between these species, and while they did not measure the dispersal ability of species in the community, they noted that the abundances of species varied both locally and seasonally. Ghara and Borges (2010) suggest that the life-history traits of community members will be affected by spatiotemporal variation in figs. Egg load and wing loading estimates from the nonpollinator community associated with Ficus petiolaris strongly support the hypothesis of a dispersal ability and fecundity trade-off (Duthie 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several hypotheses have been proposed to explain nonpollinator coexistence, including differences in the timing of oviposition (Kerdelhué et al 2000;Ghara and Borges 2010) and whether it occurs from the exterior or interior of the syconium (Kerdelhué et al 2000;Ghara et al 2011). While these differences likely promote niche partitioning to some degree, it is difficult to explain the observed diversity based only on these modest differences.…”
Section: The Fig-fig Wasp Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%