2022
DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.2c00093
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative Life Cycle Evaluation of the Global Warming Potential (GWP) Impacts of Renewable Natural Gas Production Pathways

Abstract: Renewable natural gas (RNG) sources are being considered in future energy strategy discussions as potential replacements for fossil natural gas (FNG). While today’s supply of RNG resources is insufficient to meet U.S. demands, there is significant interest in its viability to supplement and decarbonize the natural gas supply. However, the studies compare the life cycle global warming potential (GWP) of various RNG production pathways are lacking and focus mostly on a singular pathway. This effort is an attempt… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Costs and life cycle GHG emissions associated with the upgrading process (including biogas compression, contaminants removal, and methane concentration) were based on the literature (Table S4 in the SI). 31,41,42 Selling price of the upgraded renewable natural gas was calculated as the sum of D3 RIN credit and fossil natural gas price, whereas GHG credit of the renewable natural gas was considered based on the displacement of fossil natural gas.…”
Section: ■ Materials and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Costs and life cycle GHG emissions associated with the upgrading process (including biogas compression, contaminants removal, and methane concentration) were based on the literature (Table S4 in the SI). 31,41,42 Selling price of the upgraded renewable natural gas was calculated as the sum of D3 RIN credit and fossil natural gas price, whereas GHG credit of the renewable natural gas was considered based on the displacement of fossil natural gas.…”
Section: ■ Materials and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To illustrate the implications and potential trade-offs of incorporating RIN credits, a “new-RIN” design was considered where the new WWT process was implemented, but biogas from IC and AnMBR was upgraded and sold as renewable natural gas instead of combusted for heat and electricity production (conventional natural gas would be purchased to satisfy the biorefinery heating demand). Costs and life cycle GHG emissions associated with the upgrading process (including biogas compression, contaminants removal, and methane concentration) were based on the literature (Table S4 in the SI). ,, Selling price of the upgraded renewable natural gas was calculated as the sum of D3 RIN credit and fossil natural gas price, whereas GHG credit of the renewable natural gas was considered based on the displacement of fossil natural gas.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Carbon in wastewater is biogenic, and CO 2 emissions are not produced during the combustion of RNG. 33 Based on the experimental results (see Table S4), 0.00105 Nm 3 RNG was produced from 1 kg of wastewater from the aPHA production process. Therefore, it was assumed that some of the LNG used to produce aPHA was substituted with the RNG.…”
Section: ■ Materials and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Natural gas produced from wastewater is known as renewable natural gas (RNG). Carbon in wastewater is biogenic, and CO 2 emissions are not produced during the combustion of RNG . Based on the experimental results (see Table S4), 0.00105 Nm 3 RNG was produced from 1 kg of wastewater from the aPHA production process.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The environmental impacts of integrating anaerobic digestion with technologies (i.e., scrubbing, compression) that can upgrade biogas to renewable natural gas were assessed in Europe (i.e., Sweden, Denmark) employing IPCC and ReCiPe. Only 3% of the studies conducting LCA of anaerobic digestion utilized TRACI (Figure b and Table S10). Both TRACI and IPCC were preferred over ReCiPe in Canada and the USA to determine the environmental impacts of anaerobic digestion with organic municipal solid waste and animal waste as feedstocks. These preferred methods were also used to compare anaerobic digestion with gasification , and composting in North America. Studies in Brazil, South Africa, and Australia conducted environmental impact analyses of anaerobic digestion and compared between anaerobic digestion and composting by applying CML and ReCiPe using feedstocks of organic municipal solid waste and animal waste. , …”
Section: Applications Of Data Science In Rrcc From Organic Waste Streamsmentioning
confidence: 99%