1995
DOI: 10.2307/840604
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative Jurisprudence (II): The Logic of Legal Transplants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0
2

Year Published

1999
1999
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 155 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
19
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…For at least 20 years anthropologists have acknowledged the weaknesses and distortions of an earlier tradition that treated 'tribes' and 'societies' as isolated, self-contained, timeless units (Collier and Starr, 1989). Alan Watson's 'transplants thesis', even in its weaker and more plausible versions (Ewald, 1995) draws attention to the near-ubiquity of diffusion and transplantation of laws, a fact which goes a long way to account for significant patterns in any realistic picture of law in the world (Twining, 2000, Ch. 6).…”
Section: (B) Legal and Cultural Relativismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For at least 20 years anthropologists have acknowledged the weaknesses and distortions of an earlier tradition that treated 'tribes' and 'societies' as isolated, self-contained, timeless units (Collier and Starr, 1989). Alan Watson's 'transplants thesis', even in its weaker and more plausible versions (Ewald, 1995) draws attention to the near-ubiquity of diffusion and transplantation of laws, a fact which goes a long way to account for significant patterns in any realistic picture of law in the world (Twining, 2000, Ch. 6).…”
Section: (B) Legal and Cultural Relativismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These competing arguments about what shapes water laws, and thus what those laws reflect, share a common belief that laws primarily mirror something beyond themselves (Ewald, 1995). At the other end of the spectrum lie the so-called theories of "black-letter law" where legal texts are interpreted more literally and self-referentially.…”
Section: Legal Mirrors and Legal Transplantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At some stages in the development process, the two may be interdependent, while at other stages they may be autonomous. There is no reason not to believe that a similar dynamic may be at work in the interplay between the evolution of the judiciary and economic growth, and the legal transplant school of comparative law has marshaled an enormous body of evidence showing that substantive law develops independent of economic and social variables (Ewald 1995).…”
Section: Rationales For Judicial Reformmentioning
confidence: 99%