2023
DOI: 10.1080/10298436.2023.2177850
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative investigation of laboratory and field compaction techniques for designing roller compacted concrete pavements (RCCP)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Likewise, Sengun et al ( 16 , 53 ) noticed a 47% reduction in the compressive strength of VT-compacted specimens compared with FSs. This negative effect could be ascribed to the lower compaction energy of the VT when compared with that of field compaction ( 54 ). These findings reveal that the existing ASTM parameters for the VH and VT methods must be tailored to simulate the field behavior in the laboratory.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Likewise, Sengun et al ( 16 , 53 ) noticed a 47% reduction in the compressive strength of VT-compacted specimens compared with FSs. This negative effect could be ascribed to the lower compaction energy of the VT when compared with that of field compaction ( 54 ). These findings reveal that the existing ASTM parameters for the VH and VT methods must be tailored to simulate the field behavior in the laboratory.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, in RCCP, the specimens were fabricated with a vibratory hammer, as compared with the vibratory table in JPCP. The employment of a vibratory hammer caused a denser packing (packing density—0.86), which produced higher compactness and thereby enhanced the strength ( 35 , 36 ). However, the use of a conventional vibratory table in the JPCP specimen preparation resulted in a dispersed aggregate skeleton (packing density—0.75) and a higher fraction of voids (0.25), thus negatively affecting the compressive strength.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%