2017
DOI: 10.1007/s10973-017-6212-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative investigation for the determination of kinetic parameters for biomass pyrolysis by thermogravimetric analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
24
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
3
24
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The deviation was more pronounced at high temperatures, probably due to the very low mass in the crucible. Humidity evaporation was observed between ambient temperature and 150 • C, as already mentioned in previous works [19,31].…”
Section: Thermogravimetric and Differential Thermogravimetic (Dtg) Chsupporting
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The deviation was more pronounced at high temperatures, probably due to the very low mass in the crucible. Humidity evaporation was observed between ambient temperature and 150 • C, as already mentioned in previous works [19,31].…”
Section: Thermogravimetric and Differential Thermogravimetic (Dtg) Chsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…The kinetic parameters determined by thermogravimetric measurements are very sensitive to the calculation methods used [19,31]. Therefore, their determination in this study was carried out using the Coats-Redfern method by taking into consideration two different models proposed in the literature [32,33].…”
Section: Kinetic Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They estimated the average E a for cellulose, hemicellulose, and lignin to be 141, 126, and 167 kJ/mol, respectively. According to their study, the E a required was the highest for lignin, which was in contradiction to the study conducted by Huang et al There are other studies available in the literature regarding the estimation of E a for different kinds of biomass using the model‐free method …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…Where N k represents the number of points for the curve evaluated and Np is the number of parameters of the model (Abdelouahed, Leveneur, Vernieres-Hassimi, Balland, & Taouk, 2017).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%