2011
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkr1062
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative interactomics with Funcoup 2.0

Abstract: FunCoup (http://FunCoup.sbc.su.se) is a database that maintains and visualizes global gene/protein networks of functional coupling that have been constructed by Bayesian integration of diverse high-throughput data. FunCoup achieves high coverage by orthology-based integration of data sources from different model organisms and from different platforms. We here present release 2.0 in which the data sources have been updated and the methodology has been refined. It contains a new data type Genetic Interaction, an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
61
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
61
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Instead, the aim is to automate the ranking of the polymorphic genes according to their distance and specific route (rather than the large shared network) to the known, experimentally validated core gene. We show here that the current state-of-the-art methods String (7), FunCoup (8), and HumanNet (9), although excellent for polygenic research, are not optimized for monogenic phenotype/disease research as, in most cases, they cannot predict the single biologically plausible distance and route between a pair of genes that are not directly connected (Figs. S2-S7, Materials and Methods).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Instead, the aim is to automate the ranking of the polymorphic genes according to their distance and specific route (rather than the large shared network) to the known, experimentally validated core gene. We show here that the current state-of-the-art methods String (7), FunCoup (8), and HumanNet (9), although excellent for polygenic research, are not optimized for monogenic phenotype/disease research as, in most cases, they cannot predict the single biologically plausible distance and route between a pair of genes that are not directly connected (Figs. S2-S7, Materials and Methods).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The abundance of high-throughput data provides an opportunity to test this hypothesis of pathogenesis and pathway homogeneity (5,6). However, it is often almost impossible to detect biological links between very small numbers of genes with state-of-the-art programs, such as String (7), FunCoup (8), and HumanNet (9), unless they are predicted to be directly connected in a pathway. These programs provide estimates for direct connections or for the extended network shared by two given genes from the same pathway, rather than the specific pathway (i.e., route) between any two given genes of interest.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A non-exhaustive list includes InWeb 19 , GeneMANIA 53 , Funcoup 17 , I2D 54 , PINA 55 , ConsensusPathDB 56 , STRING 48 , and IMEx consortium 9 , and mentha 57 …”
Section: ) Mapping and Interpreting Protein-protein Interaction Netwmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rossin et al, 13 developed disease association protein-protein link evaluator (DAPPLE, www.broadinstitute.org/mpg/dapple/) to show that proteins encoded in Crohn’s disease and rheumatoid arthritis physically interact to suggest specific biological processes and candidate genes in incriminated loci. This algorithm has become widely used in the genetics community and has for example also been used to analyze data from inflammatory bowel diseases 16 and type 2 diabetes 17 (Figure 4). Similarly, Bergholdt et al, integrated protein-protein interactions and GWAS data to identify candidate genes in type 1 diabetes 15 .…”
Section: ) Protein-protein Interaction Network For Understanding Comentioning
confidence: 99%
“…known to be involved in a particular disease or condition. The web service is run using default or user-specified values for the following parameters: 'Query network' (default: Homo sapiens)-one of the 11 currently available model organism networks in FunCoup 3.0 (Schmitt et al, 2014); 'Network confidence threshold' (default: 0.75)-a confidence threshold for the links in the underlying network, known as pfc in FunCoup (Alexeyenko et al, 2011);and the 'Hypergeometric Cutoff' (default 0.1)-a hypergeometric probability cutoff to ensure that identified genes are statistically enriched in connections to the query set. These parameters can be altered according to user guidelines found at the MaxLink Web site.…”
Section: Implementation and Featuresmentioning
confidence: 99%