1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0165-1218(97)00053-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative induction of micronuclei in repair-deficient and -proficient Chinese hamster cell lines following clastogen or aneugen exposures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the VP-16 group, a total of 208 MN were analyzed by FISH and 83 MN (39.9%) were signal-positive. This result is similar to findings obtained by CREST-staining of VP-16-induced MN in Chinese hamster cells [Hermine et al, 1997] and contrasts with data from neonatal human lymphocytes [Slavotinek et al, 1993] and the human lymphoblastoid cell line TK6 [Wang and Eastmond, 2002] (Table II), 59.0% had one signal, 31.3% contained two signals, and 9.6% had Ն3 signals. This distribution indicates that more than half of the signal-positive MN were formed by a single lagging chromosome and the rest of the signal-positive MN contained several lagging chromosomes or nondisjoined chromatids.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…In the VP-16 group, a total of 208 MN were analyzed by FISH and 83 MN (39.9%) were signal-positive. This result is similar to findings obtained by CREST-staining of VP-16-induced MN in Chinese hamster cells [Hermine et al, 1997] and contrasts with data from neonatal human lymphocytes [Slavotinek et al, 1993] and the human lymphoblastoid cell line TK6 [Wang and Eastmond, 2002] (Table II), 59.0% had one signal, 31.3% contained two signals, and 9.6% had Ն3 signals. This distribution indicates that more than half of the signal-positive MN were formed by a single lagging chromosome and the rest of the signal-positive MN contained several lagging chromosomes or nondisjoined chromatids.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Etoposide induces DNA strand breaks by inhibiting the ligation function of DNA topoisomerase II [Hande, 1998]. Etoposide is a mutagen in vitro and a clastogen in vivo [Sjoblom et al, 1994;Garriott et al, 1995;Hermine et al, 1997;Boos and Stopper, 2000].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The induction of micronuclei has for long been recognized as a consequent of radiotherapy as well as genotoxic chemotherapeutics [158][159][160]. Treatment-induced micronuclei formation has been linked to adaptation to a G2/M cell cycle arrest.…”
Section: Tumor-promoting Features Of Cgas/sting Signalingmentioning
confidence: 99%