“…Since such carbonyl species must be formed as a consequence of a support-promoted reduction process of the copper and taking also into account that the relatively low frequency of this band, with respect to those expected for this type of carbonyls [60], has been related to the interaction between the partially reduced copper centers and the underlying ceria [27,29,40,41,51], the correlation evidenced by Figure 7 reveals that the active species for CO oxidation under CO-PROX conditions must be related to surface-dispersed partially reduced copper oxide species interacting with the support, i.e., at CuO-support interfacial positions. This is consistent with the aforementioned results collected in previous reports [27,29,40,49], which show that these copper species are the most reducible upon contact with CO at low temperatures within a process whereby the ceria support that is in contact with the copper species can also become reduced [27,29,61,62]. Thus, differences between the CO oxidation activities under CO-PROX conditions for this type of catalyst is related to the extent of support promotion of such partial (to Cu + ) CuO reduction at interfacial sites which is attained in each case.…”